# The Glymphatic–Immune Axis in Glioblastoma: Mechanistic Insights and Translational Opportunities

**Authors:** Joaquin Fiallo Arroyo, Jose E. Leon-Rojas

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/ijms27020928 · 2026-01-16

## TL;DR

This paper explores how brain fluid dynamics and immune system dysfunction contribute to glioblastoma treatment resistance and highlights new therapeutic strategies.

## Contribution

The paper introduces the glymphatic–immune axis as a novel framework for understanding and targeting glioblastoma resistance.

## Key findings

- Dysfunction in the glymphatic system and immune evasion contribute to glioblastoma progression.
- New imaging techniques allow in vivo assessment of glymphatic function and interstitial flow.
- Combining barrier modulation with immunotherapy and nanomedicine shows promise for overcoming treatment resistance.

## Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the most treatment-resistant human malignancies, largely due to the interplay between disrupted fluid dynamics, immune evasion, and the structural complexity of the tumor microenvironment; in addition to these, treatment resistance is also driven by intratumoral heterogeneity, glioma stem cell persistence, hypoxia-induced metabolic and epigenetic plasticity, adaptive oncogenic signaling, and profound immunosuppression within the tumor microenvironment. Emerging evidence shows that dysfunction of the glymphatic system, mislocalization of aquaporin-4, and increased intracranial pressure compromise cerebrospinal fluid–interstitial fluid exchange and impair antigen drainage to meningeal lymphatics, thereby weakening immunosurveillance. GBM simultaneously remodels the blood–brain barrier into a heterogeneous and permeable blood–tumor barrier that restricts uniform drug penetration yet enables tumor progression. These alterations intersect with profound immunosuppression mediated by pericytes, tumor-associated macrophages, and hypoxic niches. Advances in imaging, including DCE-MRI, DTI-ALPS, CSF-tracing PET, and elastography, now allow in vivo characterization of glymphatic function and interstitial flow. Therapeutic strategies targeting the fluid-immune interface are rapidly expanding, including convection-enhanced delivery, intrathecal and intranasal approaches, focused ultrasound, nanoparticle systems, and lymphatic-modulating immunotherapies such as VEGF-C and STING agonists. Integrating barrier modulation with immunotherapy and nanomedicine holds promise for overcoming treatment resistance. Our review synthesizes the mechanistic, microenvironmental, and translational advances that position the glymphatic–immune axis as a new frontier in glioblastoma research.

## Linked entities

- **Proteins:** AQP4 (aquaporin 4), VEGFC (vascular endothelial growth factor C), STING1 (stimulator of interferon response cGAMP interactor 1)
- **Diseases:** glioblastoma (MONDO:0018177), GBM (MONDO:0018177)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** VEGFC (vascular endothelial growth factor C) [NCBI Gene 7424] {aka Flt4-L, LMPH1D, LMPHM4, VRP}, AQP4 (aquaporin 4) [NCBI Gene 361] {aka MIWC, MLC4, WCH4, hAQP4}, STING1 (stimulator of interferon response cGAMP interactor 1) [NCBI Gene 340061] {aka ERIS, MITA, MPYS, NET23, SAVI, STING}
- **Diseases:** glioma (MESH:D005910), GBM (MESH:D005909), malignancies (MESH:D009369), hypoxic (MESH:D002534), hypoxia (MESH:D000860)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12841659/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12841659