# Treatment Efficacy of Semantic Feature Analysis in Logopenic and Semantic Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia

## TL;DR

This study shows that Semantic Feature Analysis therapy helps improve language and quality of life in people with two types of primary progressive aphasia.

## Contribution

The study introduces an elaborated SFA approach and evaluates its effectiveness in both logopenic and semantic PPA variants.

## Key findings

- Significant improvements in naming and language scores were observed after SFA treatment in both PPA groups.
- Treatment gains were partially maintained one month post-treatment, exceeding pre-treatment levels.
- Logopenic PPA participants showed better naming scores, while semantic PPA participants had better quality of life scores.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by gradual and progressive deterioration of speech and language abilities. Speech and language therapy is considered an important intervention to slow decline and support the recovery of linguistic functions in individuals with PPA. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of an elaborated Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA) approach in enhancing naming abilities and semantic networks in individuals with the logopenic and semantic variants of PPA. Methods: Fourteen participants were recruited, including seven individuals with logopenic PPA and seven with semantic PPA. All participants received an elaborated SFA intervention twice weekly for four weeks. The Aphasia Language Assessment Test (ADD), the Turkish Picture Naming Test (T-RAT), and the SAQOL-39 were conducted at the following three time points: prior to treatment (pre-test), immediately after treatment (post-test), and one month post-treatment (follow-up). Results: Significant improvements were observed in ADD, T-RAT, and SAQOL-39 scores in both logopenic and semantic PPA groups following treatment (p < 0.05). Although follow-up scores declined compared to posttest performance (p < 0.05), several follow-up scores remained higher than pretest levels. Between-group comparisons indicated no significant difference in ADD scores; however, logopenic PPA participants demonstrated higher T-RAT scores (p < 0.05), while semantic PPA participants showed higher SAQOL-39 scores, except at follow-up (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest that the elaborated SFA intervention is effective in improving naming skills, language functioning, and quality of life in both logopenic and semantic variants of PPA. Although treatment gains partially decreased after one month, many improvements were maintained above baseline, supporting the clinical value of SFA in managing language decline in PPA.