# The Genetic and Epigenetic Architecture of Keratoconus: Emerging Pathways and Clinical Implications

## TL;DR

Keratoconus is a complex eye disease caused by genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors, with new research pointing to potential early detection and treatment strategies.

## Contribution

This review integrates two decades of research to reveal genetic and epigenetic pathways in keratoconus and their clinical implications.

## Key findings

- Genetic loci like ZNF469 and COL5A1 are consistently linked to keratoconus.
- Epigenetic changes, including altered DNA methylation and microRNA dysregulation, influence corneal disease progression.
- Translational approaches like polygenic risk scores and RNA-based therapies show promise for early diagnosis and treatment.

## Abstract

Background: Keratoconus (KC) is a progressive corneal ectasia and a leading cause of corneal transplantation in young adults. Once regarded as a biomechanical disorder, KC is now recognized as a complex disease driven by genetic predisposition, epigenetic modulation, and environmental triggers. Advances in genomics and transcriptomics have begun to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying corneal thinning and ectasia. Objectives: This review synthesizes two decades of evidence on the genetic and epigenetic architecture of keratoconus, highlights key molecular pathways implicated by these findings, and discusses translational implications for early diagnosis, risk prediction, and novel therapeutic strategies. Methods: A narrative review was conducted of peer-reviewed human, animal, and in vitro studies published from 2000 to 2025, with emphasis on genome-wide association studies (GWAS), sequencing data, methylation profiling, and non-coding RNA analyses. Findings were integrated with functional studies linking genetic variation to molecular and biomechanical phenotypes. Results: Genetic studies consistently implicate loci such as ZNF469, COL5A1, LOX, HGF, FOXO1, and WNT10A, alongside rare variants in Mendelian syndromes (e.g., brittle cornea syndrome, Ehlers–Danlos spectrum). Epigenetic research demonstrates altered DNA methylation, dysregulated microRNAs (e.g., MIR184, miR-143, miR-182), and aberrant lncRNA networks influencing extracellular matrix remodeling, collagen cross-linking, oxidative stress, and inflammatory signaling. Gene–environment interactions, particularly with eye rubbing and atopy, further shape disease expression. Translational progress includes polygenic risk scores, tear-based biomarkers, and early preclinical studies using RNA-based approaches (including siRNA and antisense oligonucleotides targeting matrix-degrading and profibrotic pathways) and proof-of-concept gene-editing strategies demonstrated in corneal cell and ex vivo models. Conclusions: Keratoconus arises from the convergence of inherited genomic risk, epigenetic dysregulation, and environmental stressors. Integrating multi-omic insights into clinical practice holds promise for earlier detection, precision risk stratification, and development of targeted therapies that move beyond biomechanical stabilization to disease modification.