# Effectiveness of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Burns in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

## TL;DR

This study reviews evidence on using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for treating burns in children and adolescents, finding it effective in speeding healing and reducing surgical needs.

## Contribution

The study provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of NPWT's effectiveness in pediatric and adolescent burn patients, highlighting its benefits compared to conventional treatments.

## Key findings

- NPWT reduces re-epithelialization time and improves scar appearance in pediatric burn patients.
- NPWT decreases the need for skin grafts and lowers treatment costs by reducing surgical interventions and dressing changes.
- Despite some limitations in study design, NPWT shows promise as an adjunct therapy for burn treatment in children and adolescents.

## Abstract

Background: Burns represent a public health problem because they generate both physical and psychological damage, especially in the child and adolescent population, and high costs, especially due to the management of scars. Advances in burn care have improved survival and quality of life for this population. New clinical trials have been conducted on the benefits of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), showing that it improves the healing of burns and the appearance of scars. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the efficacy of NPWT both alone and as an adjunct to conventional dressings in pediatric and adolescent patients compared with conventional treatments. Methodology: A systematic search was carried out between December 2023 and the last quarter of 2025 in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. This meta-analysis was performed following the PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and was registered in PROSPERO with registration number CRD42024597293. The risk of bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the studies. Quantitative meta-analyses using random-model effects were performed only for variables with sufficient comparable data among studies. For other outcomes, where meta-analysis was not feasible due to lack of comparable data or control groups, results were synthesized qualitatively. Results: A total of seven articles (three clinical trials and four retrospective studies), in which a total of 323 subjects participated, were included. The main results demonstrate the efficacy of NPWT, as it decreases the re-epithelialization time, improves the appearance of scars (MD = −1.25 (95% CI between −1.80 and −0.70)), reduces the probability of skin grafts (OR = 0.17 (95% CI between 0.06 and 0.46)), and therefore, as there is less need for surgery and fewer dressing changes, reduces costs. Conclusions: NPWT offers significant clinical benefits in the treatment of burns in children and adolescents. Although a meta-analysis could not be performed due to the lack of a control group in some studies, studies with larger samples and multicenter designs will be necessary to better assess the relevant clinical outcomes. However, the results of this study show that NPWT is effective in treating burns in children and adolescents and that its use in clinical practice may represent a promising adjunctive therapy.