Durability of Exercise vs. Revascularization in Intermittent Claudication: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Focusing on Patient-Centered Outcomes

TL;DR

Exercise therapy provides long-lasting benefits for patients with intermittent claudication, while revascularization offers quicker relief but requires repeat procedures over time.

Contribution

An updated meta-analysis comparing the long-term durability of exercise therapy and revascularization for intermittent claudication.

Findings

Exercise therapy and revascularization both improve quality of life and walking distance at 12 months.

Exercise therapy provides sustained benefits beyond 24 months, while revascularization benefits decline due to restenosis.

Combining revascularization with exercise therapy yields better outcomes than exercise alone in the short term.

Abstract

Intermittent claudication (IC) is the most frequent symptomatic manifestation of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD). Supervised exercise therapy (SET) and endovascular revascularization (ER) are established treatments, but their relative and combined effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SET, ER, and ER+SET, with HRQoL as the primary outcome. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020, PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were used in December 2024. Eligible RCTs enrolled with IC (excluding critical limb-threatening ischemia) and reported validated HRQoL outcomes at ≥3 months. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) for HRQoL and mean differences (MDs) for walking distance. Results: Five RCTs (n = 728) were included. Compared with optimal medical therapy, both SET and ER improved HRQoL and walking distance. At 12 months, no significant effect was observed between SET and ER (SMD 0.02; 95% CI: −0.18 to 0.22). ER+SET was superior to SET alone (SMD 0.35; 95% CI: 0.12–0.57). Beyond 24 months, improvements were sustained with SET but attenuated with ER, accompanied by higher reintervention rates in ER-containing arms (approximately 20–30% by 2 years). Adverse events were rare (<1%). Conclusions: Given moderate-certainty evidence (GRADE), SET should remain the first-line therapy for intermittent claudication because it provides durable improvements in patient-centered outcomes with minimal harm. Endovascular revascularization (ER) can provide faster symptom relief, but its long-term benefits are constrained by restenosis and repeat procedures, particularly in femoropopliteal disease.

Figures