Do ESG Frameworks Capture Corporate Health Impacts? An Analysis of the Food and Beverage Industry

TL;DR

This study examines how well ESG investment frameworks capture the health impacts of the food and beverage industry, finding significant gaps in certain areas.

Contribution

The study introduces a novel analysis of ESG frameworks using the HEALTH-CORP-FB typology to assess coverage of health-impacting activities in the food and beverage industry.

Findings

ESG frameworks cover 39% of health-impacting activities in the food and beverage industry on average.

Gaps are most pronounced in domains like Products and Services and Political Practices.

Health-focused ESG fields are less likely to measure corporate performance in certain domains.

Abstract

Investors use information about companies’ social and environmental performance to make investment decisions, a strategy known as Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investment analysis. ESG screening may offer a mechanism to incentivize corporations to improve their health impact. However, there has been limited investigation of the extent to which ESG investment frameworks capture corporate health impacts in major industries. In this study, we sought to characterize the extent to which ESG frameworks address the health-impacting activities of the food and beverage (F&B) industry. To do this, we conducted a deductive framework analysis during the period of September 2023 to March 2024. Specifically, we identified gaps in existing ESG frameworks by comparing the content of five ESG reporting standards and rating systems to the HEALTH-CORP-FB typology, an evidence-based typology that describes the health-impacting activities of the F&B industry across seven domains (Governance Practices, Political Practices, Preference and Perception Shaping Practices, Economic Practices, Employment Practices, Products and Services, and Environmental Practices). To further assess how ESG frameworks account for the health-impacting activities of the F&B industry, we classified health-focused ESG fields in the packaged foods subindustry by two attributes: relevance to the assigned HEALTH-CORP-FB activity (low, medium, high) and type of business operations addressed (e.g., process, performance). Results indicate that, on average, the ESG fields (n = 1348) covered 39% of the 89 HEALTH-CORP-FB activities (range across frameworks: 27–48%). Higher proportions of activities in the Governance, Environmental, Employment, and Economic Practices domains (range across domains: 43–87%) were represented than activities in the Products and Services, Preference and Perception-Shaping Practices, and Political Practices domains (17–36%). Fields assigned to the latter domains were also less likely to be deemed highly relevant and to measure corporate performance. We conclude that the ESG frameworks included in this study capture some of the activities of the F&B industry that affect population health and health equity; however, critical gaps remain. We discuss how integrating key health-focused ESG indicators (e.g., revenue generation from ultra-processed foods) into existing frameworks could enable investors, public health organizations, civil society, and shareholder advocates to strengthen the accountability of the F&B sector with respect to health.

Figures