# Subacute and Chronic Low-Back Pain: From MRI Phenotype to Imaging-Guided Interventions

**Authors:** Giulia Pacella, Raffaele Natella, Federico Bruno, Michele Fischetti, Michela Bruno, Maria Chiara Brunese, Mario Brunese, Alfonso Forte, Francesco Forte, Biagio Apollonio, Daniele Giuseppe Romano, Marcello Zappia

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics16020240 · Diagnostics · 2026-01-12

## TL;DR

This paper provides a roadmap linking MRI findings in low-back pain patients to specific image-guided treatments, aiming to improve outcomes and reduce unnecessary procedures.

## Contribution

A novel phenotype-driven framework that connects MRI-based classifications to targeted interventions for subacute and chronic low-back pain.

## Key findings

- MRI phenotyping can distinguish radicular from non-radicular low-back pain.
- A standardized care-pathway table links MRI patterns to diagnostic blocks and treatments.
- Image-guided interventions like RFA and injections are detailed with guidance on safety and effectiveness.

## Abstract

Low-back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. When symptoms persist beyond 4–6 weeks, when red flags are suspected, or when precise patient selection for procedures is needed, imaging—primarily MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging)—becomes pivotal. The purpose is to provide a pragmatic, radiology-first roadmap that aligns an imaging phenotype with anatomical targets and appropriate image-guided interventions, integrating MRI-based phenotyping with image-guided interventions for subacute and chronic LBP. In this narrative review, we define operational MRI criteria to distinguish radicular from non-radicular phenotypes and to contextualize endplate/Modic and facet/sacroiliac degenerative changes. We then summarize selection and technique for major procedures: epidural and periradicular injections (including selective nerve root blocks), facet interventions with medial branch radiofrequency ablation (RFA), sacroiliac joint injections and lateral branch RFA, basivertebral nerve ablation (BVNA) for vertebrogenic pain, percutaneous disc decompression, minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MILD), and vertebral augmentation for painful fractures. For each target, we outline preferred and alternative guidance modalities (fluoroscopy, CT, or ultrasound), key safety checks, and realistic effect sizes and durability, emphasizing when to avoid low-value or poorly indicated procedures. This review proposes a phenotype-driven reporting template and a care-pathway table linking MRI patterns to diagnostic blocks and definitive image-guided treatments, with the aim of reducing cascade testing and therapeutic ambiguity. A standardized phenotype → target → tool approach can make MRI reports more actionable and help clinicians choose the right image-guided intervention for the right patient, improving outcomes while prioritizing safety and value.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** painful fractures (MESH:D010146), vertebrogenic pain (MESH:D001416), sacroiliac degenerative (MESH:C563037), LBP (MESH:D017116)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12840132/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12840132/full.md

## References

61 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12840132/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12840132