# Advanced Microstructural Investigation of the Endodontic Sealing Ability of Three Different Obturation Techniques

**Authors:** Mihaela Păstrav, Radu Marcel Chisnoiu, Marioara Moldovan, Lucian Barbu Tudoran, Ioan Petean, Andrea Maria Chisnoiu, Ovidiu Păstrav

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/dj14010009 · Dentistry Journal · 2025-12-23

## TL;DR

This study compares three root canal filling techniques using a resin-based sealer to determine their effectiveness in sealing and microstructural properties.

## Contribution

The study introduces a detailed microstructural and elemental comparison of three obturation techniques using SEM and EDX.

## Key findings

- The single cone (SC) method showed strong adhesion but uneven sealer distribution.
- Warm vertical condensation (WVC) provided a thin and uniform sealing layer.
- All techniques achieved effective sealing with AH Plus sealer.

## Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated and compared the sealing ability and elemental composition of a resin-based endodontic sealer (AH Plus) used with three root canal obturation techniques: single cone (SC), lateral compaction (LC), and warm vertical condensation (WVC). The investigation focused on microstructural characteristics, interfacial integrity, and elemental distribution within filled root canals. Material and Methods: Sixty extracted single-root teeth were instrumented using the ProTaper Gold system and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 20) according to the obturation technique. The AH Plus Jet sealer was applied in all cases. Following obturation, samples were subjected to radiographic investigation and analyzed using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) to assess the sealing performance and chemical composition. Results: Radiographic and microscopic assessments indicated that the SC method showed strong gutta-percha adhesion to dentin with a thin cement layer, whereas WVC provided excellent adaptation and penetration of gutta-percha. The LC technique demonstrated good adhesion but displayed occasional structural irregularities. SC has the thicker adhesion layer with uneven distribution regarding coronal, median, and apical, regions ranging from 45 to 80 μm, while WVC ensures a thin and uniform sealing layer of about 35 μm in all regions. SEM and EDX analyses detailed the interfacial microstructure and confirmed the presence of carbon (C), oxygen (O), calcium (Ca), zinc (Zn), barium (Ba), and sulfur (S) across all groups. Conclusions: All three obturation techniques (SC, WVC, LC) achieved effective sealing when combined with the AH Plus sealer. The main difference between the methods consists of the sealer layer thickness and its even distribution regarding gutta-percha cones.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** carbon (PubChem CID 5462310), oxygen (PubChem CID 977), calcium (PubChem CID 5460341), zinc (PubChem CID 23994), barium (PubChem CID 5355457), sulfur (PubChem CID 5362487)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** S (MESH:D013455), Ba (MESH:D001464), Zn (MESH:D015032), Ca (MESH:D002118), AH Plus (MESH:C534916), O (MESH:D010100), C (MESH:D002244)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12839949/full.md

## Figures

13 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12839949/full.md

## References

40 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12839949/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12839949