# Pediatric Trauma Undertriage: Working Toward a Better Threshold Based on Trauma Center Resource Utilization

**Authors:** Caitlin J. Crosier, Amber Mehmood, Keith Thatch, David J. Cisela, Etienne E. Pracht, Christopher W. Snyder

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/children13010095 · Children · 2026-01-09

## TL;DR

Current trauma severity systems work better for adults than children, but a new resource-based score called ICASS is more accurate for predicting the need for pediatric trauma resources.

## Contribution

ICASS outperforms existing mortality-based scores like ISS and ICISS in predicting pediatric trauma resource needs.

## Key findings

- ICASS has an area under the curve of 0.812 for predicting need for pediatric trauma resources, outperforming ISS and ICISS.
- ISS has only 36% sensitivity at the standard threshold of 15, while ICASS has 95% sensitivity at a threshold of 5.

## Abstract

What are the main findings?
•Current trauma injury severity systems are mortality-based and are derived from adult data; therefore, they have exhibited greater accuracy for adult trauma patients compared to pediatric trauma patients.•International Classification of Disease Critical Care Severity Score (ICASS), a resource-based metric, has greater sensitivity to predict need for pediatric trauma resources compared to the Injury Severity Score (ISS) or the International Classification of Disease (ICD) Injury Severity Score (ICISS) in injured children.

Current trauma injury severity systems are mortality-based and are derived from adult data; therefore, they have exhibited greater accuracy for adult trauma patients compared to pediatric trauma patients.

International Classification of Disease Critical Care Severity Score (ICASS), a resource-based metric, has greater sensitivity to predict need for pediatric trauma resources compared to the Injury Severity Score (ISS) or the International Classification of Disease (ICD) Injury Severity Score (ICISS) in injured children.

What are the implications of the main findings?
•Pediatric trauma systems should consider utilizing ICASS to assist in defining undertriage in pediatric trauma.•Future studies may consider comparing ICASS to other pediatric-specific trauma severity of injury metrics to better define injury severity and trauma center resource utilization in this population.

Pediatric trauma systems should consider utilizing ICASS to assist in defining undertriage in pediatric trauma.

Future studies may consider comparing ICASS to other pediatric-specific trauma severity of injury metrics to better define injury severity and trauma center resource utilization in this population.

Background/Objectives: Pediatric trauma systems require accurate metrics for evaluating triage decisions. Undertriage occurs when an injured child requires pediatric trauma center resources but is treated at a center lacking those resources. Current undertriage definitions utilize mortality-based scores, including the Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15 or the International Classification of Disease (ICD) Injury Severity Score (ICISS). However, resource-based metrics like the ICD Critical Care Severity Score (ICASS) may be preferable in children. This study evaluated the relationship of ISS, ICISS and ICASS to the need for pediatric trauma resources (NFPTCR) to derive a more empiric definition of undertriage. Methods: The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients aged ≤ 15 years old. NFPTCR was defined as blood product transfusion within 4 h, invasive procedure for cardiopulmonary stabilization/contamination/bleeding within 72 h, initial admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or ICU stay ≥ 3 days, intubation, mechanical ventilation and general anesthesia ≤ 5 years old, or physical child abuse. ICASS and ICISS were derived from 2014 to 2018 datasets and applied to the 2019 dataset. The ability of ISS, ICISS and ICASS to distinguish NFPTCR patients was assessed using multivariable logistic regression and receiver–operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Out of 97,773 children, 15,985 (16%) were NFPTCR+. ISS, ICISS and ICASS had areas under the curve of 0.760, 0.701 and 0.812 for NFPTCR+, respectively (all p < 0.001). ISS had 36% sensitivity at 15; whereas ICASS had 95%, 93% and 89% sensitivity at 5, 10 and 15, respectively. Conclusions: ICASS was superior to ISS and ICISS for identifying NFPTCR. Consideration should be given to redefining pediatric trauma undertriage based on resource-based metrics, like ICASS.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Injury (MESH:D014947), child abuse (MESH:C535569), bleeding (MESH:D006470)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12839860/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12839860/full.md

## References

28 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12839860/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12839860