# Diagnostic Performance of Cardiac CT and Transthoracic Echocardiography in Congenital Heart Disease: A Surgical Correlation Study

**Authors:** Shiraslan Bakhshaliyev, Ergin Arslanoğlu, Heydar Huseynov, Damla İnce, Bahruz Aliyev, Fatih Yiğit, Bulent Polat, Cenap Zeybek

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics16020259 · Diagnostics · 2026-01-14

## TL;DR

This study compares the accuracy of echocardiography and CT scans in diagnosing heart defects in infants and young children, finding both methods highly effective.

## Contribution

The study provides a direct comparison of TTE and MSCT diagnostic performance in CHD using surgical findings as the gold standard.

## Key findings

- TTE and MSCT showed high diagnostic accuracy (98% and 97.62%, respectively) for congenital heart disease.
- TTE had higher sensitivity than MSCT for cardiac malformations (100% vs. 88.41%).
- Both modalities showed substantial agreement in diagnosing heart-great vessel and great vessel malformations.

## Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and 128-slice multislice computed tomography (MSCT) angiography in congenital heart disease (CHD). Methods: Between January 2018 and August 2022, 50 patients diagnosed with CHD underwent both TTE and ECG-gated 128-MSCT. The imaging findings were compared with intraoperative observations, categorizing pathologies into cardiac, heart–great vessel, and great vessel malformations. Results: The median age of the patients was 0.45 months, and the median weight was 5 kg. Echocardiography showed a sensitivity of 89.8% and specificity of 99.12%, with an overall accuracy of 98%. MSCT had a sensitivity of 87.9%, specificity of 98.95%, and accuracy of 97.62%. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two modalities (χ2 = 31.796, p = 0.215), with substantial agreement (kappa = 0.901). For surgically confirmed cardiac malformations (n = 69), echocardiography had a 100% sensitivity, whereas MSCT had an 88.41% sensitivity (χ2 = 20.633, p = 0.039), with high concordance (kappa = 0.931). For heart–great vessel connection anomalies (n = 27), both modalities had an 81.48% sensitivity (χ2 = 14.115, p = 0.481), with substantial agreement (kappa = 0.887). For great vessel malformations (n = 61), the echocardiography and MSCT sensitivities were 81.97% and 88.52%, respectively, with no significant difference in performance (χ2 = 30.303, p = 0.063), indicating substantial concordance (kappa = 0.863). Conclusions: Both TTE and MSCT are highly accurate for CHD diagnosis, each with unique advantages. Their complementary use, especially where one modality is limited, enables a more comprehensive assessment, supporting clinical decision-making and surgical planning.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** congenital heart disease (MONDO:0005453)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** cardiac malformations (MESH:D006331), CHD (MESH:D006330), cardiac, heart-great vessel, and great vessel malformations (MESH:D014188)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12839741/full.md

## References

17 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12839741/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12839741