# Faster Diagnosis of Suspected Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: Single-Center Evidence from BIOFIRE FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel Results vs. Conventional Culture Method

## TL;DR

A new test called the BIOFIRE FilmArray Pneumonia panel detects lung infections faster and more accurately than traditional methods.

## Contribution

The study provides single-center evidence of the diagnostic superiority of the BIOFIRE FilmArray Pneumonia panel over conventional culture methods for lower respiratory tract infections.

## Key findings

- The PN panel detected pathogens in 54% of samples compared to 33.9% with conventional culture.
- The PN panel showed high sensitivity (89.02%) and specificity (97.86%) for most bacterial targets.
- Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently detected pathogen by both methods.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Syndromic multiplex PCR assays such as BIOFIRE FilmArray® Pneumonia (PN) panel enable rapid and simultaneous detection of bacterial and viral pathogens in respiratory specimens, improving diagnostic accuracy and patient management in lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Methods: In this retrospective observational study, PN panel results in 410 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples from hospitalized patients with suspected pneumonia were analyzed and compared with those obtained using the conventional culture (CC) method. Results: The PN panel showed an overall positivity rate of 54%, detecting bacteria in 39.0% of samples, viruses in 7.1%, and atypical bacteria in 2.2%. Using the conventional culture (CC) method, 33.9% of samples tested positive. Overall, 83 (20.2%) samples that were positive by the PN panel were negative by CC, whereas only 14 specimens (3.4%) were positive by CC and negative by PN panel. The most frequently detected pathogen by both the PN panel and CC was Staphylococcus aureus (n = 67, 16.34% for PN; n = 40, 9.76% for CC). Regarding diagnostic performance, the PN panel demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.02%, a specificity of 97.86%, and an overall accuracy of 97.63%. Lower sensitivity values were observed only for the Enterobacter cloacae complex (57.14%) and the Klebsiella pneumoniae group (75%). Specificity exceeded 92% for all bacterial targets. Conclusions: The PN panel confirms enhanced pathogen detection and a shortened time-to-result. It serves as a valuable adjunct for the timely diagnosis of LRTIs, supporting antimicrobial stewardship through more precise and appropriate antibiotic selection.