Correction: Association of coffee consumption pattern and metabolic syndrome among middle-aged and older adults: a cross-sectional study
Ren Nina, Huang Lingling, Li Qiushuang, Guo Honglin, Sun Liyuan, Zhang Yuting
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCoffee research and impacts · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Sleep and related disorders
There was a mistake in the caption of Table 2 for the values of the ORs of the elevated FBG for women. We previously stated:
“Table 2 summarized the multivariable-adjusted OR and 95% CI of MetS components across the type of coffee by gender. Regardless of the coffee type, compared with non-coffee consumers, coffee consumers had higher ORs of the elevated FBG in both men (OR: 3.590; 95% CI: 2.891–4.457) and women (OR: 3.590; 95% CI: 2.891–4.457). In women, the prevalence of elevated blood pressure (OR: 0.661; 95% CI: 0.454–0.963) was significantly lower in black coffee consumers than in non-coffee consumers. The same inverse association can be also found in other types of coffee consumption.”
The corrected caption of Table 2 appears below.
“Table 2 summarized the multivariable-adjusted OR and 95% CI of MetS components across the type of coffee by gender. Regardless of the coffee type, compared with non-coffee consumers, coffee consumers had higher ORs of the elevated FBG in both men (OR: 3.590; 95% CI: 2.891–4.457) and women (OR: 3.464; 95% CI: 2.589–4.634). In women, the prevalence of elevated blood pressure (OR: 0.661; 95% CI: 0.454–0.963) was significantly lower in black coffee consumers than in non-coffee consumers. The same inverse association can be also found in other types of coffee consumption.”
In the abstract, there was a mistake in the values of the ORs of the elevated FBG for women. We previously stated:
“Regardless of the coffee type, compared with non-coffee consumers, coffee consumers had higher odds ratios (ORs) of the elevated fasting blood glucose (FBG) in both men [OR: 3.590; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.891–4.457] and women (OR: 3.590; 95% CI: 2.891–4.457).”
This has been corrected to read:
“Regardless of the coffee type, compared with non-coffee consumers, coffee consumers had higher odds ratios (ORs) of the elevated fasting blood glucose (FBG) in both men [OR: 3.590; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.891–4.457] and women (OR: 3.464; 95% CI: 2.589–4.634).”
The original version of this article has been updated.