# Numerical Investigation on Drag Reduction Mechanisms of Biomimetic Microstructure Surfaces

**Authors:** Jiangpeng Liu, Jie Xu, Chaogang Ding, Debin Shan, Bin Guo

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics11010077 · Biomimetics · 2026-01-18

## TL;DR

This study uses simulations to explore how biomimetic microstructures reduce drag, finding that blade-groove shapes perform best.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a comprehensive design framework for optimizing drag-reducing microstructures through geometry and dimensional analysis.

## Key findings

- Blade-groove surfaces achieve the highest drag reduction rate of 18.2%.
- Stable near-wall microvortices form dynamic isolation layers that enhance drag reduction.
- Maintaining an aspect ratio h+/s+ ≥ 0.75 preserves effective vortex structures in blade-grooves.

## Abstract

Biomimetic microstructured surfaces offer a promising passive strategy for drag reduction in marine and aerospace applications. This study employs computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to systematically investigate the drag reduction performance and mechanisms of groove-type microstructures, addressing both geometry selection and dimensional optimization. Three representative geometries (V-groove, blade-groove, and arc-groove) were compared under identical flow conditions (inflow velocity 5 m/s, Re = 7.5 × 105) using the shear-stress-transport (SST k-ω) turbulence model, and the third-generation Ω criterion was employed for threshold-independent vortex identification. The results establish a clear performance hierarchy: blade-groove achieves the highest drag reduction rate of 18.2%, followed by the V-groove (16.5%) and arc-groove (14.7%). The analysis reveals that stable near-wall microvortices form dynamic vortex isolation layers that separate the high-speed flow from the groove valleys, with blade grooves generating the strongest and most fully developed vortex structures. A parametric study of blade-groove aspect ratios (h+/s+ = 0.35–1.0) further demonstrates that maintaining h+/s+ ≥ 0.75 preserves effective vortex-isolation layers, whereas reducing h+/s+ below 0.6 causes vortex collapse and performance degradation. These findings establish a comprehensive design framework combining geometry selection (blade-groove > V-groove > arc-groove) with dimensional optimization criteria, providing quantitative guidance for practical biomimetic drag-reducing surfaces.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** Drag (-)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12839315/full.md

## Figures

13 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12839315/full.md

## References

50 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12839315/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12839315