# Retinal Thickness Profiles in Parkinsonian Syndromes: Discerning Parkinson’s Disease, Multiple System Atrophy, and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy via Optical Coherence Tomography

## TL;DR

This study uses optical coherence tomography to examine retinal thickness differences in Parkinson’s disease and related conditions, aiming to find non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis.

## Contribution

The study identifies specific retinal layer thickness patterns that may help distinguish Parkinson’s disease from atypical parkinsonism and healthy controls.

## Key findings

- PD and PSP patients show thinner GCIPL compared to healthy controls, but MSA does not.
- RNFL and central macula thickness are reduced in all patient groups compared to healthy controls.
- PSP patients have thinner macular segments compared to PD patients.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Clinical differentiation between Parkinson’s disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonism (AP) remains complex. Current diagnostic procedures helpful in their distinction lack specificity, making non-invasive tools like optical coherence tomography (OCT) crucial in evaluating possible retinal changes as potential biomarkers. Our study examined the thickness of the ganglion cell inner plexiform layer complex (GCIPL), peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular segments in individuals with PD, multiple system atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and healthy controls (HC). The objective of our study was to determine if OCT analyses can effectively discriminate PD patients from HC and whether retinal thickness can distinguish typical PD patients from those with AP. Methods: Research was an observational, cross-sectional study. Multiple retinal layers measured with OCT of PD and AP patients were compared with age- and sex-matched HC. An intergroup assessment was conducted. Results: Patients with PD and PSP exhibit a thinner GCIPL compared to HC, with no difference observed in the MSA group. GCIPL thickness between investigational groups does not differentiate between PD and AP. The RNFL and central macula thickness were statistically significantly reduced in all patient groups compared to HC. The RNFL was thinner in PSP compared to PD. Nearly all inner and outer macular segments were thinner in the investigational groups compared to HC. The preservation of outer nasal segments distinguished HC from both typical and AP. Patients with PSP and PD differed in the thickness of all macular segments, being thinner in PSP patients. Conclusions: Thickness of multiple retinal layers and macular regions might serve as a distinguishing feature between PD, AP and HC.