# Collagen Type I as a Biological Barrier Interface in Biomimetic Microfluidic Devices: Properties, Applications, and Challenges

**Authors:** Valentina Grumezescu, Liviu Duta

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics11010066 · Biomimetics · 2026-01-13

## TL;DR

This review explores how collagen type I is used to create realistic biological barriers in microfluidic devices, highlighting its benefits, applications, and remaining challenges.

## Contribution

The paper provides a comprehensive review of collagen type I's role in microfluidic systems, emphasizing recent engineering advances and future research priorities.

## Key findings

- Ultrathin collagen barriers enable faster molecular exchange and short-range signaling.
- Collagen supports epithelial and endothelial polarization and tight junction formation better than synthetic materials.
- Persistent challenges include batch variability and difficulties in scaling fabrication without losing bioactivity.

## Abstract

Collagen type I has become a practical cornerstone for constructing biologically meaningful barrier interfaces in microfluidic systems. Its fibrillar architecture, native ligand display, and susceptibility to cell-mediated remodeling support epithelial and endothelial polarization, tight junctions, and transport behaviors that are difficult to achieve with purely synthetic barrier interfaces. Recent advances pair these biological strengths with tighter engineering control. For example, ultrathin collagen barriers (tens of micrometers or less) enable faster molecular exchange and short-range signaling; gentle crosslinking and composite designs limit gel compaction and delamination under flow; and patterning/bioprinting introduce alignment, graded porosity, and robust integration into device geometries. Applications now span intestine, vasculature, skin, airway, kidney, and tumor–stroma interfaces, with readouts including transepithelial/transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER), tracer permeability, and image-based quality control of fiber architecture. Persistent constraints include batch variability, long-term mechanical drift, limited standardization of fibrillogenesis conditions, and difficulties scaling fabrication without loss of bioactivity. Priorities include reporting standards for microstructure and residual crosslinker, chips for continuous monitoring, immune-competent co-cultures, and closer collaboration across materials science, microfabrication, computational modelling, and clinical pharmacology. Thus, this review synthesizes the state-of-the-art and offers practical guidance on technological readiness and future directions for using collagen type I as a biological barrier interface in biomimetic microfluidic systems.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** tumor (MESH:D009369)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12838551/full.md

## Figures

23 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12838551/full.md

## References

141 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12838551/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12838551