Tetracycline Resistance Among Canine Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) Clinical Isolates: Is Minocycline a Viable Treatment Option?
Magdalena Kizerwetter-Świda, Dorota Chrobak-Chmiel, Ilona Stefańska, Ewelina Kwiecień, Rafał Nejfeld, Magdalena Rzewuska

TL;DR
This study examines tetracycline resistance in canine MRSP isolates and evaluates minocycline as a potential treatment option.
Contribution
The study identifies MRSP genotypes and their resistance profiles to determine minocycline's viability as a treatment.
Findings
Most MRSP isolates (54%) belonged to ST71 with SCCmec II–III and showed minocycline susceptibility.
Isolates with SCCmec V (40%) were resistant to all tetracyclines and carried multiple tet genes.
Minocycline susceptibility was observed in 56% of isolates, but resistance was common in SCCmec V genotypes.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Infections caused by multidrug-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) strains are becoming increasingly common in veterinary medicine. Depending on which tet genes are present, MRSP isolates may exhibit resistance to all tetracyclines or resistance to tetracycline and doxycycline with susceptibility to minocycline. As minocycline may be a potential treatment option, our study aimed to verify this hypothesis. We have compared phenotypic resistance to tetracyclines with the presence of the tet(K), tet(L), tet(M), and tet(O) genes and conducted the molecular characterization of 50 clinical MRSP isolates of canine origin. Methods: The presence of the tet genes was determined by PCR. Molecular characterization included multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing. Results: Among the 50…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4- —Science development fund of the Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus · Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research · Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
1. Introduction
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) is a multidrug-resistant, opportunistic pathogen that primarily affects dogs and is rarely found in other animal species [1,2]. Occasionally, it may also cause zoonotic infections, particularly among persons in close contact with dogs, such as dog owners and veterinarians [3,4]. The spread of zoonotic staphylococci is facilitated by close in-house contact, such as sharing a bed with dogs or being licked by them. However, the transfer of resistance genes may also occur among various bacteria, as confirmed by the literature [5].
The number of antimicrobial agents potentially active against multidrug-resistant staphylococci is quite limited [1,6,7,8]. Resistance to tetracyclines among MRSP strains is relatively common, with reported prevalence ranging from approximately 20% (16.3% in Sweden; 21.7% in Argentina) to over 70% (74% in Finland; 85.7% in South Africa), depending on geographic region and study population [8,9,10,11,12]. However, depending on the molecular mechanism, resistance to all tetracycline drugs may be observed, or strains may be resistant to antimicrobials of this group, except for minocycline, which remains a potential therapeutic option for these bacteria [13,14].
There are two known mechanisms of tetracycline resistance in staphylococci: ribosomal protection and efflux pumps [15,16]. Protective ribosome modifications in staphylococci are encoded by genes tet(M), tet(O), tet(S), tet(W), tet(44), and membrane-associated efflux proteins by the genes tet(K), tet(L), tet(38), tet(42), tet(43), tet(45) and tet(65) (https://faculty.washington.edu/marilynr/, accessed on 28 November 2025). According to the literature data, tet(M), tet(K) and tet(L) genes are the most prevalent in MRSP isolates, as in other Staphylococci [9,14,17]. The presence of different tet genes does not necessarily affect susceptibility to minocycline and glycylcyclines (glycylcyclines are not approved for use in veterinary medicine) [17]. MRSP isolates carrying the tet(K) or tet(L) genes exhibit resistance to tetracycline and doxycycline, but are susceptible to minocycline. While isolates with the tet(M) or the tet(O) genes are resistant to all antibiotics from the tetracycline group, including minocycline. Therefore, minocycline may be considered a potential treatment option for MRSP infections [13]. Nevertheless, data on the phenotypic susceptibility of MRSP isolates to minocycline and on the prevalence of genes from the tet group, especially tet(L) and tet(O), are still limited.
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates is a molecular technique used in epidemiology, enabling the determination of dominant clones within a population [2,18,19]. In genotypic characterization, staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing is also often performed [20,21]. Initially, the global MRSP population was dominated by sequence type 71 (ST71), which carried cassette SCCmec II–III, and ST68, which carried cassette SCCmec V, in Europe and North America, respectively [2,19,20]. Isolates from Asia were more heterogeneous, with the most prevalent being ST45 and ST121. Since 2010, an increase in the diversity of STs has been observed. New clones, such as ST258 and ST45, have emerged in Europe, while ST84, ST150, and ST155 have appeared in North America [21,22,23,24]. In Poland, ST71 dominated until 2015, while in later years ST551 with cassette SCCmec V was most frequently detected [25]. These data clearly indicate that the MRSP population is constantly evolving.
Notably, individual MRSP clones are characterized by divergent antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, which result from the presence of different mobile genetic elements that carry distinct resistance genes. By combining MLST with antimicrobial susceptibility testing, it is possible to correlate specific STs with characteristic resistance profiles, track the dissemination of high-risk clones, and monitor the emergence of new lineages [1,2]. This approach offers valuable insights into the evolution of multidrug resistance in MRSP, supporting evidence-based decisions for therapy, infection control, and surveillance in veterinary medicine. As already mentioned, there is a gap in the literature data concerning minocycline resistance and the prevalence of different tet genes in specific STs among MRSP isolates.
The objective of this study was to compare phenotypic resistance to tetracycline-class antimicrobials, as determined by the disk diffusion method and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, with the presence of the tet(K), tet(L), tet(M), and tet(O) resistance genes among clinical MRSP isolates of canine origin. Additionally, MLST and SCCmec typing were performed to assess minocycline susceptibility among the genotypes identified in the tested MRSP isolates.
2. Results
2.1. Bacterial Isolates
Bacterial canine isolates were obtained from clinical materials obtained from skin and soft tissue infections (n = 29), urinary tract infections (n = 12) and from other clinical materials, i.e., internal organs (n = 2), nasal swab (n = 2), conjunctiva swab (n = 2), throat swab (n = 1), oral swab (n = 1) and stool sample (n = 1) (Table S1). All isolates showed typical S. pseudintermedius colony characteristics and were catalase-positive. After Gram staining, all demonstrated Gram-positive cocci morphology. For all 50 isolates tested, a 926 bp thermonuclease nuc gene fragment specific for S. pseudintermedius was obtained. Methicillin resistance was confirmed by the oxacillin disk method and by detecting a 532 bp mecA gene fragment.
2.2. Tetracycline Susceptibility Testing
Phenotypic susceptibility testing results for individual isolates are presented in Table S1. The correlations between MIC values and inhibition zone diameters of tetracycline, doxycycline and minocycline are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3. The results obtained with the disk diffusion method and MIC values determination were consistent. In general, 9 (18%) out of 50 MRSP isolates were recognized as susceptible to all antimicrobials from tetracycline group. The remaining 41 isolates (82%) exhibited resistance to tetracycline and doxycycline. Among these 41 isolates, 22 were also found to be minocycline-resistant, resulting in 44% of tested MRSP resistant to three tetracyclines used in this study. Additionally, Table 1 presents summary results regarding MIC values, i.e., MIC range, MIC_50_, MIC_90_, and percentage of resistant isolates with confidence intervals (CI = 95%).
2.3. Detection of Tetracycline Resistance Genes
Among the tested isolates, the tet(K) gene was most frequently detected, either as a single tet(K) gene (n = 19; 38%), the tet(K) with the tet(M) gene (n = 10; 20%), or in a combination of three genes: tet(K), tet(M) and tet(O) (n = 8; 16%). Two genes, tet(M) and tet(O), were detected in two MRSP isolates. Similarly, two genes, tet(M) with tet(L), were identified in a single isolate (n = 1; 2%). Additionally, a single tet(M) gene was present in one isolate (n = 1; 2%). The tested genes from the tet group were not detected in 9 (18%) of the studied isolates, which were also phenotypically susceptible to tetracyclines.
2.4. Molecular Characterization of MRSP Isolates
MLST analysis revealed that ST71 was the predominant sequence type among the isolates in this study (n = 29; 58%). The next most frequently detected STs were ST551 (n = 9; 18%) and ST2851 (n = 9; 18%). Additionally, single isolates from other STs were recognized: ST258, ST672 and ST2869. Two novel sequence types, ST2851 and ST2869, were found and deposited in the S. pseudintermedius MLST database (https://pubmlst.org/organisms/staphylococcus-pseudintermedius, accessed on 28 December 2025). The results of SCCmec typing showed that SCCmec II–III was the most prevalent (n = 27; 54%), followed by SCCmec V (n = 20; 40%). The third cassette type detected in the three isolates (6%) tested was SCCmec IV.
Comparison of the MLST and the SCCmec typing results showed that among the isolates belonging to ST71, the SCCmec II–III cassette was the most common. Additionally, these isolates were characterized either by the absence of the tet genes or by the presence of a single tet(K) gene. The SCCmec V cassette was detected only in isolates from ST551, ST2851, and ST672, which also carried either the tet(M) gene alone or both the tet(M) and tet(K) genes. The correlations between detected tet genes, STs and SCCmec typing results are shown in Figure 4 and Table 2.
Considering the changes in S. pseudintermedius over the years of the study (2007–2024), initially, the population of MSRP isolates was dominated by ST71-II–III. However, after 2015, ST551 and new STs were most frequently detected, among which ST2851 predominated.
3. Discussion
In this study, we presented the phenotypic susceptibility testing results of 50 canine clinical MRSP isolates to tetracycline group antimicrobials, molecular tetracycline resistance mechanisms, and molecular typing of the isolates. Our results confirmed diverse tetracycline resistance in MRSP isolates from different STs, which carried different SCCmec cassettes. Tetracycline resistance was detected in the majority of our isolates (n = 41; 82%). Further, 22 (44%) of these 41 isolates were also resistant to minocycline, while 19 (38%) were susceptible to this antimicrobial but resistant to tetracycline and doxycycline. However, considering all isolates tested, 28 (56%) were found to be susceptible to minocycline. Our results are consistent with literature data indicating a correlation between individual STs and resistance profiles, with minocycline susceptibility occurring significantly more frequently for isolates belonging to ST71 carrying the II–III SCCmec cassette.
It should be emphasized that, as mentioned in the introduction, there is a literature gap in data concerning minocycline resistance in methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius. Most studies report tetracycline or doxycycline resistance testing results, as well as the occurrence of tet(K) and tet(M) genes [14,24]. Minocycline resistance is less frequently determined. Moreover, even if such data are available, MLST and SCCmec typing are often missing. Some studies concern only methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MSSP), and it is known that they have different resistance profiles than MRSP. For this reason, the scarce literature data should be interpreted with caution. Furthermore, MIC breakpoints for minocycline and staphylococci of canine origin were not available until 2024, when CLSI recommendations defined the breakpoint for susceptible isolates as less than or equal to 0.5 mg/L, for intermediate as 1.0 mg/L, and for resistant isolates as greater than or equal to 2.0 mg/L [26]. Results from previous years, when these breakpoints were not accessible, showed that the human tetracycline breakpoints overestimated susceptibility to minocycline for veterinary S. pseudintermedius isolates. Moreover, the minocycline breakpoint of 0.25 mg/L or less, proposed by Hnot et al. (2015) [27], was lower than the human breakpoints, but it allowed for obtaining reliable resistance testing results for minocycline and veterinary isolates. Minocycline-resistant MRSP isolates with confirmed presence of tet(M) genes were correctly identified using a proposed MIC susceptibility breakpoint [27]. Additionally, the results obtained by Maaland et al. 2014 confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed breakpoint value in relation to PK/PD minocycline data in dogs [13]. Accordingly, it may be assumed that the interpretation of MIC results prior to the release of the current CLSI recommendations differed. Under earlier provisional breakpoints, isolates with MIC values of 0.5 mg/L and 1 mg/L would have been classified as resistant, whereas according to the current recommendations, they are categorized as susceptible and intermediate, respectively.
Notably, three out of 50 MRSP isolates tested in this study exhibited a MIC for minocycline of 1.0 mg/L, which, according to the latest CLSI recommendations, should be reported as intermediate susceptibility. However, all three isolates carried two or three tet genes in different configurations, e.g., tet(K)-tet(M)-tet(O), tet(K)-tet(M), or tet(M)-tet(L). It should be emphasized that in each case, genetic determinants of minocycline resistance were present. These results suggest a possible revision of the minocycline breakpoints recommended by CLSI.
In one study conducted in Canada and the USA, resistance to minocycline was detected in 31% of MRSP isolates, which is a relatively low level of resistance for multidrug-resistant isolates. Similarly to our results, strains carrying the tet(M) gene were confirmed to be resistant to minocycline; the tet(K) gene was associated with susceptibility to this antimicrobial. However, detection of the tet(K) and tet(M) genes and only dru typing were used for molecular characterization. In some cases, the tet(M) gene was not detected in minocycline-resistant isolates, suggesting the presence of other tet genes [14]. It is also known that in different geographical regions, distinct sequence types with characteristic resistance profiles predominate in the MRSP population. This is confirmed by studies of MRSP isolates from Japan, in which phenotypic methods revealed minocycline resistance in 59% of strains [28]. The prevalence of minocycline resistance among MRSP isolates originating from different regions of the USA ranged from 73.6% to 78.6%, which is a higher level of resistance than described in this study [29]. A systematic review indicated that tetracycline resistance is more frequent in ST258 and ST45 (over 90%) compared to ST71 (51%), and that the tet(K) gene is associated with ST71, in contrast to tet(M), which is more common in other STs [2]. Although this review did not include minocycline, the occurrence of individual tet genes in different STs suggests a higher level of minocycline susceptibility in ST71 isolates.
Available literature indicates that substantial epidemiological shifts have occurred within the global population of clinical MRSP isolates, including changes in the predominant sequence types across different geographical regions. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated a significant worldwide increase in the incidence of ST551 after 2013 [30]. Isolates belonging to ST551 have been reported in Portugal, Sweden, and Poland [9,25,30]. The increase in ST551 prevalence has been particularly evident in Europe and has coincided with a decline in the abundance of ST71 [30]. Nevertheless, the factors underlying the epidemiological success of ST551 remain poorly understood. This phenomenon may, at least in part, be attributed to local selective pressure associated with antimicrobial use. ST551 strains most commonly carry the SCCmec type V cassette and frequently exhibit resistance to minocycline [30]. Although the present study is based on a relatively limited number of isolates, our findings are consistent with previously published data. Notably, the newly described ST2851 represents a single-locus variant of ST551 and belongs to clonal complex CC551. Similar changes in the MSRP population have been described in recent years in Sweden, where an increase in the frequency of ST551 occurrence has also been observed [9]. Kang et al. (2017) [31] reported that among MRSP strains in Korea, the most prevalent clonal complexes (CC) were CC568 and CC677, which differ significantly from CC occurring in Europe, North America and Asia. In this study, 86.6% of the MRSP isolates were tetracycline-resistant and only one isolate (1.6%) showed minocycline resistance. Moreover, SCCmec type V was the major cassette detected in 45% of the isolates [30]. These results confirm that the tet genes are not located within the SCCmec cassettes, but on mobile genetic elements. The tet(M) gene is often associated with Tn916, Tn5801, or 5801-like transposons. The tet(K) gene is located on small plasmids, such as those from the pSC family [31,32,33,34].
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Bacterial Isolates
A total of 50 MRSP isolates were studied. The isolates were cultured between 2007 and 2024 from clinical materials taken from dogs by veterinarians and referred for microbiological examination at the Microbiological Diagnostic Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW. Each isolate originated from a different animal that belonged to different owners and had no apparent epidemiological relationship. All isolates were cultured on Columbia Agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood (Graso Biotech, Starogard Gdański, Poland), and incubated aerobically for 24 h at 35 °C ± 2 °C. Pure cultures were stored at −20 °C. Presumptive identification of S. pseudintermedius was based on standard bacteriologic methods (colony morphology on Columbia blood agar, Gram staining, catalase test) and confirmed by the PCR as described by Sasaki et al. (2010), involving species-specific amplification of thermonuclease gene fragment [35]. Methicillin resistance was determined by the disk diffusion method with oxacillin (1 µg, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), in accordance with the CLSI veterinary guidelines [26]. The presence of the mecA gene was tested using PCR method described by Strommenger et al. (2003) [36]. S pseudintermedius ATCC 49444 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 33592 were used as references in species-specific PCR and amplification of the mecA gene. Isolates obtained between 2007 and 2024 were selected for the study.
4.2. DNA Extraction from MRSP Isolates
Genomic DNA was extracted from all MRSP isolates with the Genomic DNA Mini Kit (A&A Biotechnology, Gdansk, Poland) using lysostaphin according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C.
4.3. Tetracycline Susceptibility Testing
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for tetracycline (30 µg), doxycycline (30 µg), and minocycline (30 µg) was performed using the disk diffusion method [26]. All antimicrobial disks were purchased from Oxoid (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). Additionally, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of tetracycline, minocycline, and doxycycline were evaluated using gradient strips (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). Briefly, suspensions of bacterial cells with a turbidity of a 0.5 McFarland standard were prepared and spread on Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA, Grasso Biotech, Poland). The disks and gradient strips were placed on inoculated MHA and subjected to aerobic incubation at 35 °C ± 2 °C. They were read after 20 to 24 h of incubation. Quality control was performed using the following reference strains: S. aureus ATCC 25923 for the disk diffusion method, S. aureus ATCC 29213 for MIC testing. Confidence intervals were calculated using the online sample size calculator tool (https://www.sample-size.net, accessed on 28 November 2025). The most current version of CLSI veterinary guidelines was used for the interpretation of the AST results (Table S2). Isolates in the intermediate category were classified as resistant for the purpose of analysis.
4.4. Detection of Tetracycline Resistance Genes
The presence of tetracycline resistance genes was determined by PCR amplification using the primers listed in Table 3.
4.5. Molecular Characterization of MRSP Isolates
Multilocus sequence typing of seven housekeeping genes (tuf, cpn60, pta, purA, fdh, ack, and sar) was used to determine the sequence types among examined MRSP [18]. The sequence types were assigned by comparing the obtained sequences with those available in the PubMLST database. Isolates with new combinations of alleles were submitted to the MLST database curator Vincent Perreten for assignment.
All the MRSP isolates were also subjected to SCCmec typing as previously described by Kondo et al. (2007) [20]. Additionally, SCCmec cassette type II–III was identified using the PCR method, as described by Descloux et al. (2008) [39].
5. Conclusions
In the case of multidrug-resistant MRSP isolates, each potential therapeutic option is particularly important; therefore, monitoring minocycline resistance and the prevalence of different tet genes among MRSP isolates is crucial. Therefore, for some strains of MRSP, minocycline may be a viable treatment option. Our results are in line with the literature data, which show a significantly higher incidence of minocycline susceptibility and tetracycline and doxycycline resistance in MRSP ST71-II–III. These isolates are typically characterized by the absence of the tet genes or the presence of a single tet(K) gene. Furthermore, isolates belonging to ST551 and ST2851, which carry SCCmec type V, had the tet(M) and tet(K) genes, or even three genes. Resistance to minocycline was found to be much more frequent in these isolates.
The results obtained in this study indicate that minocycline may have limited efficacy against MRSP infections in Poland. Nevertheless, in other geographic areas, specific genotypes—such as those carrying clonal complex 71 with the SCCmec type II–III cassette—may remain susceptible, making minocycline a potential therapeutic option. These findings underscore the importance of continuous surveillance of MRSP clones, including the distribution of tet genes and associated minocycline resistance profiles, to support evidence-based antimicrobial therapy. Furthermore, the results suggest that minocycline should be included in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical MRSP isolates.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Nocera F.P. De Martino L. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius: Epidemiological changes, antibiotic resistance, and alternative therapeutic strategies Vet. Res. Commun.2024483505351510.1007/s 11259-024-10508-839167258 PMC 11538175 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Pires Dos Santos T. Damborg P. Moodley A. Guardabassi L. Systematic Review on Global Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius: Inference of Population Structure from Multilocus Sequence Typing Data Front. Microbiol.20167159910.3389/fmicb.2016.0159927803691 PMC 5067483 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Ruiz-Ripa L. Simón C. Ceballos S. Ortega C. Zarazaga M. Torres C. Gómez-Sanz E.S. S. pseudintermedius and S. aureus lineages with transmission ability circulate as causative agents of infections in pets for years BMC Vet. Res.2021174210.1186/s 12917-020-02726-433478473 PMC 7819200 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Moses I.B. Santos F.F. Gales A.C. Human Colonization and Infection by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius: An Emerging and Underestimated Zoonotic Pathogen Microorganisms 20231158110.3390/microorganisms 1103058136985155 PMC 10057476 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Frosini S.M. Bond R. Mc Carthy A.J. Feudi C. Schwarz S. Lindsay J.A. Loeffler A. Genes on the Move: In Vitro Transduction of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes between Human and Canine Staphylococcal Pathogens Microorganisms 20208203110.3390/microorganisms 812203133353175 PMC 7766859 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Adiguzel M.C. Schaefer K. Rodriguez T. Ortiz J. Sahin O. Prevalence, Mechanism, Genetic Diversity, and Cross-Resistance Patterns of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Isolated from Companion Animal Clinical Samples Submitted to a Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory in the Midwestern United States Antibiotics 20221160910.3390/antibiotics 1105060935625253 PMC 9138002 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Lynch S.A. Helbig K.J. The Complex Diseases of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in Canines: Where to Next?Vet. Sci.202181110.3390/vetsci 801001133477504 PMC 7831068 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Frank L.A. Loeffler A. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius: Clinical challenge and treatment options Vet. Dermatol 201223283-e 5610.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01047.x 22486942 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
