# A Subject-Specific Surface EMG Model for Estimating L4/L5 Compressive Loading

**Authors:** Pablo J. Dopico, Audrey Zucker-Levin, Kunal Singal, William M. Mihalko

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering13010070 · Bioengineering · 2026-01-08

## TL;DR

This study develops a personalized model using surface EMG to estimate compressive loading at the L4/L5 spine segment during dynamic tasks.

## Contribution

A novel subject-specific sEMG model is proposed for estimating L4/L5 compressive loading during movement.

## Key findings

- The sEMG model showed a significant decrease in percent error for estimated muscle forces.
- The sEMG model produced significantly higher impulse values than the AnyBody model.
- Estimated loading values were consistent with literature despite high variability.

## Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is a common cause of activity limitation in individuals that can result in socioeconomic costs up to $200 billion per year. Most cases of LBP lack a known underlying pathology. The L4/L5 motion segment is the most impaired lumbar segment, likely due to high load-bearing function. The ability to model L4/L5 compressive loading from surface electromyography (sEMG) data during dynamic activity may add to the understanding of LBP. Eight volunteers with no history of LBP participated in this study. Muscle activity of the erector spinae, rectus abdominus, and external obliques were recorded by a wireless EMG system (Trigno, Delsys, Natick, MA, USA) during a straight-leg stoop-to-stand task. L4/L5 compressive loading was estimated using a subject-specific sEMG model and validated by comparison with an AnyBody model and publicly available data from OrthoLoad. A specific trendline showed a significant decrease in percent error of estimated force for all muscles. Significantly lower impulse values were estimated by the AnyBody model than the sEMG subject-specific model (p = 0.007). Although our sEMG model was subject to high variability, loading values largely remained within those reported in the literature. Significant variation was found comparing the sEMG model with the AnyBody model, which may validate continued development and testing of personalized measurements of L4/L5 loading.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** LBP (MESH:D017116)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12837797/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12837797/full.md

## References

39 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12837797/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12837797