# Trunk Kinematics in Writhing and Fidgety Movements: A Pilot Study on Early Postural Control in Infants Using Computer Vision

## TL;DR

A pilot study shows computer vision can analyze infant movements to provide objective insights into early postural control development.

## Contribution

A computer-vision pipeline was developed to quantify trunk kinematics in infants' spontaneous movements for early neurodevelopmental assessment.

## Key findings

- Writhing movements lasted significantly longer than fidgety movements with a large effect size.
- Trunk quantity of motion did not differ between movement types.
- Trunk motion showed a significant age–sex interaction effect.

## Abstract

Background: General Movement Assessment is a strong early predictor of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes but remains qualitative and examiner-dependent. Quantitative, video-based kinematic analysis may complement General Movement Assessment by providing objective, scalable metrics. Methods: In this pilot study, a computer–vision-based pipeline was used to extract trunk center-of-mass kinematics from video recordings of spontaneous General Movements in infants under three months corrected age during the Writhing and Fidgety stage. Two measures were derived: trunk quantity of motion and movement duration. Group differences were examined using t-tests and effect sizes, and associations with corrected age and sex were explored with correlation analyses. Results: Writhing Movements were substantially longer than Fidgety Movements, with a large effect size, whereas trunk quantity of motion did not differ meaningfully between movement types. Correlations between corrected age and both the quantity of motion and duration were small and imprecise. Sex did not moderate duration changes, but trunk motion showed a significant age–sex interaction effect. Conclusions: Video-based extraction of trunk kinematics is feasible in early infancy and reveals robust differences in GMs type duration between Writhing and Fidgety Movements. Larger longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the value of these measures as early quantitative markers of postural control and neuromotor development.