# Comparison of a Single-Shot Antibiotic Protocol Compared to a Conventional 5-Day Antibiotic Protocol in Equine Diagnostic Laparotomy Regarding Pre- and Postoperative Colonization with Multi-Drug-Resistant Indicator Pathogens

## TL;DR

This study compares antibiotic protocols in horses and finds that hospitalization increases multi-drug-resistant bacteria colonization, regardless of treatment.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into MDR colonization dynamics in horses under different antibiotic regimens.

## Key findings

- Colonization with MDR pathogens increased significantly during hospitalization.
- No significant difference was found between single-shot and 5-day antibiotic protocols.
- Nasal carriage of MRSA was linked to surgical site infections.

## Abstract

Objective: The emergence and spread of multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria pose a growing threat in veterinary medicine, particularly in equine hospitals. This study investigated the colonization and infection dynamics of horses undergoing emergency laparotomy with two distinct antibiotic protocols (single-shot versus 5-day protocol) during hospitalization. Methods: Nasal swabs and fecal samples were collected from 67 horses undergoing emergency laparotomy at clinic admission as well as on postoperative days 3 and 10. These were screened for multi-drug-resistant indicator pathogens. As multi-drug-resistant indicator pathogens, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), and bacteria belonging to the Acinetobacter baumannii complex were defined. Results: Preoperatively, 6.2% of horses tested positive for MRSA and 13% for ESBL-E. An increase in colonization was observed on day 3 postoperatively, with 62.1% of nasal swabs and 86.4% of fecal samples testing positive for MDR organisms. On day 10, 53.4% of nasal swabs and 62.5% of fecal samples tested positive for indicator pathogens. Surgical site infection developed in five horses, two of which tested positive for MRSA in both nasal and wound samples during hospitalization, supporting the potential role of nasal carriage as a source of infection. Furthermore, all horses tested positive for ESBL-E during at least one time-point during hospitalization, and Enterobacterales (MDR in two surgical site infections (SSI)) were involved in all surgical site infections. No significant differences were observed between the two antibiotic treatment groups regarding colonization rates with indicator pathogens during hospitalization. However, the results indicate that hospitalization itself contributes to increased colonization with resistant bacteria. A clear limitation of the study is the restricted number of sampled horses and the lack of environmental contamination data. Non-sampled hospitalized horses with and without antibiotic treatment may have acted as reservoirs for MDR bacteria. Conclusion: The findings emphasize the need for routine environmental monitoring and strict adherence to hygiene protocols in equine clinics to reduce the risk of nosocomial transmission. Ongoing surveillance and infection control strategies are essential to mitigate the spread of MDR pathogens in veterinary settings.