# Exploring an AI-First Healthcare System

**Authors:** Ali Gates, Asif Ali, Scott Conard, Patrick Dunn

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering13010112 · Bioengineering · 2026-01-17

## TL;DR

This paper explores what healthcare would look like if AI was the core foundation of care delivery, not just an added tool, and highlights the challenges and opportunities in making this shift.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a system-level framework for an AI-first healthcare approach, emphasizing integration and long-term impact over isolated AI applications.

## Key findings

- AI excels in narrow tasks like imaging and monitoring but lacks in system-level integration and long-term outcomes.
- Barriers include data fragmentation, algorithmic bias, and insufficient governance for large-scale AI deployment.
- AI-first systems could improve care coordination and equity if supported by proper infrastructure and oversight.

## Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is now embedded across many aspects of healthcare, yet most implementations remain fragmented, task-specific, and layered onto legacy workflows. This paper does not review AI applications in healthcare per se; instead, it examines what an AI-first healthcare system would look like, one in which AI functions as a foundational organizing principle of care delivery rather than an adjunct technology. We synthesize evidence across ambulatory, inpatient, diagnostic, post-acute, and population health settings to assess where AI capabilities are sufficiently mature to support system-level integration and where critical gaps remain. Across domains, the literature demonstrates strong performance for narrowly defined tasks such as imaging interpretation, documentation support, predictive surveillance, and remote monitoring. However, evidence for longitudinal orchestration, cross-setting integration, and sustained impact on outcomes, costs, and equity remains limited. Key barriers include data fragmentation, workflow misalignment, algorithmic bias, insufficient governance, and lack of prospective, multi-site evaluations. We argue that advancing toward AI-first healthcare requires shifting evaluation from accuracy-centric metrics to system-level outcomes, emphasizing human-enabled AI, interoperability, continuous learning, and equity-aware design. Using hypertension management and patient journey exemplars, we illustrate how AI-first systems can enable proactive risk stratification, coordinated intervention, and continuous support across the care continuum. We further outline architectural and governance requirements, including cloud-enabled infrastructure, interoperability, operational machine learning practices, and accountability frameworks—necessary to operationalize AI-first care safely and at scale, subject to prospective validation, regulatory oversight, and post-deployment surveillance. This review contributes a system-level framework for understanding AI-first healthcare, identifies priority research and implementation gaps, and offers practical considerations for clinicians, health systems, researchers, and policymakers. By reframing AI as infrastructure rather than isolated tools, the AI-first approach provides a pathway toward more proactive, coordinated, and equitable healthcare delivery while preserving the central role of human judgment and trust.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** hypertension (MESH:D006973)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12837376/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12837376/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12837376