# Impact of 3D-Printed Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffold Polymorphism and Post-Processing Variations on Bone Regenerative Outcomes

**Authors:** Nicholas Jose Iglesias, Sara E. Munkwitz, Hana Shah, Savanah R. Sturm, Nicholas A. Mirsky, Adriana I. Sandino, Ricky Almada, Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak, Lukasz Witek, Paulo G. Coelho

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering13010034 · Bioengineering · 2025-12-28

## TL;DR

This study compares how different post-processing methods affect the bone regeneration performance of 3D-printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds in sheep.

## Contribution

The study provides a comparative in vivo analysis of post-processing effects on α- and β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration.

## Key findings

- No significant differences in bone deposition or scaffold resorption at 3 weeks postoperatively.
- β-TCP scaffolds sintered showed significantly better osteogenesis and resorption at 12 weeks compared to α-TCP scaffolds with hydrothermal processing.

## Abstract

Tricalcium phosphate (TCP) bioceramics, available as α- and β-polymorphs, are frequently employed in the production of three-dimensionally (3D) printed bone scaffolds. Although hydrothermal immersion processing (HP) and sintering (S) are commonly adopted as post-printing techniques for bioceramics, a comprehensive comparative analysis of their effects on the osteogenic performance of α- and β-polymorphs in vivo remains inadequately investigated. In this study, α-TCP and β-TCP scaffolds were fabricated via direct ink writing and subjected to hydrothermal immersion processing (α-TCP/HP) and sintering (β-TCP/S) prior to implantation in n = 12 skeletally mature sheep (n = 1 scaffold per group per animal), and the outcome variables were evaluated at 3 and 12 weeks postoperatively (n = 6 sheep per time point). The quantitative results showed no significant differences in bone deposition or scaffold resorption at 3 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.618 and p = 0.898, respectively). However, at 12 weeks, there was a significant increase in osteogenesis and scaffold resorption in the β-TCP/S cohort relative to the α-TCP/HP counterparts (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). β-TCP scaffolds subjected to post-print sintering exhibited superior osteoconductive and resorptive profiles compared to hydrothermal immersion-processed α-TCP scaffolds over the 12-week healing period.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** tricalcium phosphate (PubChem CID 24456), α-TCP (PubChem CID 15965), β-TCP (PubChem CID 123692)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** TCP (MESH:C018392), beta-TCP (MESH:C485817), S (MESH:D013455), alpha-TCP (MESH:C485828)
- **Species:** Ovis aries (domestic sheep, species) [taxon 9940]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12837157/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12837157/full.md

## References

36 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12837157/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12837157