Organisational variation in Recovery College implementation: 31-college qualitative study
Simran K. Takhi, Tesnime Jebara, Merly McPhilbin, Katy Stepanian, Danielle Dunnett, Jason Grant-Rowles, Yasma Osman, Gary Winship, Julie Repper, Amy Ronaldson, Mariam Namasaba, Yasuhiro Kotera, Peter Bates, Simon Lawrence, Agnieszka Kapka, Sara Meddings, Jane Rennison

TL;DR
This study explores how Recovery Colleges in England vary in their setup and operation, highlighting factors that influence their sustainability.
Contribution
The study identifies organizational factors influencing Recovery College implementation and sustainability through qualitative analysis of 31 colleges.
Findings
Recovery Colleges are often established by key individuals leveraging their positions and lived experience.
Colleges adapt to local contexts shaped by existing services, demographics, and community resources.
Sustaining operations requires ongoing organizational work to manage changing pressures.
Abstract
By 2021, we found that 88 Recovery Colleges were operating in England. Recovery Colleges adhere to shared principles including adult education and co-production, but are also heterogeneous, varying in the populations they serve, their sources of funding and access to resources. Previous research has not explored the organisational factors that influence the set-up of Recovery Colleges, nor the factors which facilitate or pose challenges to their sustainable operation. To identify how Recovery Colleges vary in their operation and to ascertain how organisational factors facilitate or hinder the set-up, running and sustainability of English Recovery Colleges. Semi-structured interviews with 31 Recovery College managers across England were analysed using framework analysis. Four themes were identified: Recovery College pioneers; Adapting to the local context; Degree of autonomy within…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMental Health and Patient Involvement · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Healthcare Quality and Management
