# Effect of a grace period on false alarm rates of smartwatch-based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest detection systems: a pilot study

**Authors:** Roelof G. Hup, Chaimae Bouchnaf, Myrthe A. Plaisier, Fatuma M.A. Omar, Tobias A. Machiavello, Sophie L.M. van Spreuwel, Hanno L. Tan, Xi Long, Rik Vullings

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101215 · 2026-01-05

## TL;DR

This study explores how a grace period in smartwatches can reduce false alarms for detecting out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, potentially improving emergency response systems.

## Contribution

The study introduces and evaluates the concept of a grace period to reduce false alarms in smartwatch-based cardiac arrest detection systems.

## Key findings

- (Audio)tactile alarms significantly reduced response times compared to auditory-only alarms.
- Grace periods of 10 and 20 seconds would cancel 98.3% and 99.6% of (audio)tactile alarms, respectively.
- Time of day, age, and sex had no significant effect on alarm response times.

## Abstract

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a leading cause of mortality, and rapid treatment is life-saving. Early detection is crucial to promptly start the chain of survival, leading to increasing interest in smartwatch-based OHCA detection. Introducing a grace period, during which the wearer can cancel a false alarm before emergency medical services (EMS) are notified, may improve system reliability. This study evaluates how this grace period affects false alarm rates.

In this study, 26 participants wore smartwatches that produced auditory, tactile or audiotactile alarms at random times during daytime, while instructed to cancel these alarms as quickly as possible. Response times were registered by the smartwatch, alongside demographic and time-of-day data. Bayesian time-to-event analysis assessed the effects of alarm type, time of day, and demographic variables.

(Audio)tactile alarms significantly shortened response times compared to auditory-only alarms (HR 0.475, 95% CI: 0.38–0.59). Grace periods of 10 and 20 s would result in 98.3% (95% CI: 97.1–99.0%) and 99.6% (95% CI: 99.2–99.9%) of the (audio)tactile alarms being canceled, respectively. No clear evidence was found for meaningful effects of time of day, age or sex.

The findings in this study suggest that the application of a grace period to smartwatch-based OHCA detection systems may potentially reduce false alarms reaching EMS with only minor delays. Further research is warranted in a larger implementation set-up.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** cardiac arrest (MONDO:0000745)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** cardiac arrest (MESH:D006323), OHCA (MESH:D058687)

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12835406/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12835406