Infectious Serology in Total Laboratory Automation: Fit or Unfit
Suneeta Meena

TL;DR
This paper discusses the challenges and opportunities of integrating infectious serology into total laboratory automation systems.
Contribution
The paper highlights the lack of uniform standards and the unique challenges in applying quality control to infectious serology in automated labs.
Findings
Infectious serology lacks uniform international standards, complicating quality control.
Automated systems offer benefits like auto-verification and reflex testing for infectious serology.
Biological variability and host immune responses remain unresolved challenges in automation.
Abstract
Several parameters of infectious serology are increasingly being incorporated into workflows of total laboratory automation (TLA). Infectious serology is not a well-defined field, with each parameter having its own requirement for reporting. The unavailability of uniform international standards further complicates quality control (QC). Infectious serology in total laboratory automation offers opportunities like integration of laboratory services, auto-verification, re-run, and reflex add-on testing. But questionable application of standard QC procedures like Westgard rules, unavailability of international standards, biological variability of pathogens, and host immune response remain challenges that require urgent solutions.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing · Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
