# Clinical validation and utility of targeted nanopore sequencing for rapid pathogen diagnosis and precision therapy in lung cancer patients with pulmonary infections

## TL;DR

This study shows that targeted nanopore sequencing quickly and accurately identifies pathogens in lung cancer patients with infections, leading to better and faster treatment.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates the clinical utility of targeted nanopore sequencing for rapid pathogen diagnosis and precision therapy in lung cancer patients.

## Key findings

- TNPseq detected more clinically relevant pathogens than mNGS with higher sensitivity and faster turnaround time.
- TNPseq-guided therapy reduced treatment duration and unnecessary antibiotic use compared to empirical therapy.
- Specific bacterial species were associated with treatment response and disease status in lung cancer patients.

## Abstract

Pulmonary infections are common in patients with lung cancer (LC), complicating diagnosis and treatment. This study explored the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of targeted nanopore sequencing (TNPseq) for detecting pathogens in LC-related pulmonary infections.

A total of 143 patients with LC or benign pulmonary diseases complicated by pulmonary infections were included and stratified into diagnostic and therapeutic cohorts. Sputum samples underwent conventional culture, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), and TNPseq analyses. Microbiota profiles were compared across disease groups and correlated with tumor therapy responses. In the therapeutic cohort, clinical outcomes were assessed between empirical therapy and TNPseq-guided therapy.

TNPseq identified a significantly higher proportion of clinically relevant pathogens compared to mNGS (48.76% vs. 16.80%, p < 0.001) and demonstrated superior sensitivity (81.25% vs. 68.75%), with a 40.7% reduction in turnaround time (16 hours vs. 27 hours). Both sequencing methods revealed an enrichment of Lactobacillus species in non-initial diagnosis lung cancer (NDLC) patients (p < 0.01). Patients exhibiting partial response or stable disease (PR/SD) showed increased abundance of Neisseria, Veillonella, and Prevotella species (p < 0.05). Clinical remission was achieved in all patients; however, 68.4% of those initially receiving empirical therapy subsequently required a switch to TNPseq-guided treatment due to its ineffectiveness. Compared to this empirical-to-TNPseq group, the median treatment duration was significantly shorter under direct TNPseq guidance (total: 6 days vs. 13 days, p < 0.01; LC subgroup: 5 days vs. 15.5 days, p < 0.05), thereby reducing unnecessary antibiotic exposure.

By enabling rapid pathogen detection and profiling of the pulmonary microbiome, TNPseq facilitates targeted therapy and reduces antibiotic overuse in LC patients. These findings highlight the potential of TNPseq as a promising, rapid, and non-invasive diagnostic candidate for first-line use, offering a comprehensive view of both infection and host-microbe interactions in immunocompromised patients.