# Broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against influenza A viruses: current insights and future directions

**Authors:** Nahed N. Mahrous, Ohoud S. Alhumaidan, Abdulaziz S. Alkhoshaiban, Rawan T. Tafish, Fatimah F. Al-Ghnnam, Maha Althubyani, Abeer Al-Hubaysh, Yahya F. Jamous

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1738181 · Frontiers in Microbiology · 2026-01-12

## TL;DR

This paper reviews monoclonal antibodies for treating influenza A, highlighting their potential, challenges, and future directions.

## Contribution

The paper provides a comprehensive review of recent advances and challenges in monoclonal antibody therapies for influenza A.

## Key findings

- Monoclonal antibodies can improve clinical outcomes in high-risk populations by reducing viral loads and disease severity.
- Broadly neutralizing antibodies targeting conserved viral regions show efficacy against antigenic drift variants.
- Challenges include high costs, administration methods, and the risk of viral escape mutations.

## Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become attractive tools for both the treatment and prevention of influenza A viruses due to their ability to target several viral components, which confers broad therapeutic potential. Advances in biotechnology, such as hybridoma technology, phage display technology, B cell immortalization, and artificial intelligence (Al)-driven antibody design, have significantly accelerated the development of effective mAbs. Clinical trials have shown that mAbs can improve clinical outcomes particularly in high-risk and immunocompromised populations by lowering viral loads and reducing disease severity. However, high production costs, the need for intravenous administration, and the risk of viral escape mutations are some of the obstacles to widespread clinical adoption. Post-marketing surveillance serves as a valuable source of information regarding safety, real-world effectiveness, and patterns of resistance. Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs), particularly those directed against conserved regions of the virus’s surface proteins, such as hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), have demonstrated efficacy against antigenic drift-derived variants. Nevertheless, the emergence of escape mutants underscores the need for careful monitoring of mAb candidates and combination therapy. Monitoring genomic shifts requires a careful focus on the targeted regions affected by combination therapy. Challenges in accessibility are compounded by financial barriers, emphasizing the importance of large-scale production and alternative delivery methods, such as inhaled mAbs. To ensure that future mAb-based therapies for influenza A are both effective and accessible, it is critical to integrate resistance surveillance tools, monitoring AI, and advanced computational modeling in therapeutic strategies. This comprehensive review discusses the potential of mAbs to enhance influenza A treatment by offering precise and adaptable alternatives to traditional antivirals. It also examines recent technological advances, clinical performance, and scalability that may redefine future therapeutic strategies.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** NEU1 (neuraminidase 1) [NCBI Gene 4758] {aka NANH, NEU, SIAL1}
- **Diseases:** influenza A (MESH:D007251)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12833332/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12833332/full.md

## References

114 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12833332/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12833332