# Clinical efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of diabetes kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

**Authors:** Liangjing Liu, Haolan Liu, Xiaoling Mao, Chao Li, Weitong Yan, Zhongmin Ou, Xianhui Li

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1729409 · Frontiers in Microbiology · 2026-01-12

## TL;DR

This study reviews clinical trials to determine if probiotics help treat kidney disease in diabetes patients, finding some benefits in blood markers.

## Contribution

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on probiotics for diabetic kidney disease.

## Key findings

- Probiotics significantly reduced serum creatinine, BUN, fasting blood glucose, and triglycerides in DKD patients.
- No significant effects were observed on eGFR, HbA1c, or total antioxidant capacity.
- Publication bias was minimal except for eGFR, and evidence certainty ranged from moderate to very low.

## Abstract

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a major microvascular complication of diabetes and the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. Growing evidence suggests that gut microbiota dysbiosis may contribute to DKD progression, and probiotics have been proposed as a potential adjunctive therapy. However, existing clinical findings remain inconsistent, with some trials reporting benefits in blood urea nitrogen (BUN), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), while others show no significant improvements. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of probiotics in patients with DKD.

Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and the Chinese Science Citation Database up to October 2025. Data were synthesized using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 16.0. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 1.0 (RoB 1.0), publication bias was evaluated with Egger’s test, and the certainty of evidence was graded according to the GRADE approach.

Seven RCTs involving 502 participants were included. Meta-analysis showed that probiotics significantly reduced serum creatinine [mean difference (MD) −0.09 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.14 to −0.04], BUN (MD −1.58 mg/dL, 95% CI −2.80 to −0.36), fasting blood glucose (MD −0.48 mmol/L, 95% CI −0.89 to −0.07), triglycerides (MD −19.17 mg/dL, 95% CI −35.14 to −3.20), total cholesterol (MD −11.68 mg/dL, 95% CI −20.37 to −2.99), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD −12.72 mg/dL, 95% CI −18.76 to −6.67), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (MD −1.59 mg/L, 95% CI −2.31 to −0.88), and malondialdehyde (MD −0.52 μmol/L, 95% CI −0.91 to −0.13). No significant effects were observed on 24-h urine protein, eGFR, 2-h postprandial blood glucose, HbA1c, insulin, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or total antioxidant capacity. Egger’s test indicated no significant publication bias for most outcomes, except for potential bias in eGFR. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low, and the strength of recommendation was strong.

Probiotic supplementation may improve renal function, glycemic control, lipid metabolism, and inflammation/oxidative stress in DKD patients. Further large, high-quality RCTs are warranted to confirm these findings.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** diabetic kidney disease (MONDO:0005016), diabetes (MONDO:0005015)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** INS (insulin) [NCBI Gene 3630] {aka IDDM, IDDM1, IDDM2, ILPR, IRDN, MODY10}, CRP (C-reactive protein) [NCBI Gene 1401] {aka PTX1}
- **Diseases:** end-stage renal disease (MESH:D007676), inflammation (MESH:D007249), diabetes (MESH:D003920), DKD (MESH:D003928)
- **Chemicals:** cholesterol (MESH:D002784), malondialdehyde (MESH:D008315), triglycerides (MESH:D014280), creatinine (MESH:D003404), lipid (MESH:D008055), glucose (MESH:D005947)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12833091/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12833091/full.md

## References

68 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12833091/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12833091