# Assessing the long-term effects of microbial therapeutics as treatment within psychiatry: a systematic review

**Authors:** Cassandra Sgarbossa, Arthi Chinna Meyyappan, Evan Forth, Hayley Bromley, Roumen Milev

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1663719 · Frontiers in Psychiatry · 2026-01-12

## TL;DR

This review examines whether gut microbiome treatments can have lasting benefits for psychiatric symptoms, finding mixed results and a need for better studies.

## Contribution

The paper provides the first systematic review of long-term effects of microbial therapeutics in psychiatry, highlighting gaps in current research.

## Key findings

- Some studies showed sustained improvement in depression and anxiety symptoms for up to 18 months.
- Other studies reported no long-term improvement in mood-related symptoms.
- Inconsistent follow-up durations across studies limit comparison of results.

## Abstract

The management and treatment of psychiatric disorders by manipulating the gut microbiome and utilizing microbial therapeutics, via modulation of the gut-brain-axis, has been a rapidly growing field of research. Given the novelty of using microbial therapeutics within psychiatry, a growing number of studies have investigated their use as treatment for various psychiatric disorders and symptoms. However, few studies have explored the longitudinal efficacy of these treatments. This review aims to summarize the findings of any studies assessing the long-term effects of gut-related interventions on mood and psychiatric symptoms.

A systematic search of 4 databases (Embase, PsycINFO, Medline, Web of Science) from inception to May 28, 2025, informed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and using key words relating to microbial therapeutics, psychiatric disorders, and long-term effects was conducted. Findings were included or excluded using pre-determined eligibility criteria such as being been written in English and published by a peer-reviewed journal, assessed for quality using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Risk of Bias tool, and qualitatively evaluated.

The search yielded 4175 studies, of which 1274 duplicates were removed. All remaining studies underwent abstract screening, from which 70 records were full-text screened and a total of ten clinical studies (n = 10) met eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The majority of studies explored the effects of microbial therapeutics such as fecal microbiota transplant and probiotics, as treatment for disorders of the gastrointestinal tract as the primary scope, with additional outcome measures assessing psychiatric well-being. The review presented with mixed findings: many studies reported a sustained improvement in symptoms of depression and anxiety ranging from 3- to 18-months post-treatment, while others reported the opposite with no sustained long-term improvement in mood-related symptoms. There was also a lack of consistency across follow-up duration between studies, making it difficult to compare findings.

Overall, this review highlighted the need for more placebo-controlled studies with larger sample sizes to effectively evaluate the longitudinal potential of microbial therapeutics as treatment for mood-disturbances and psychiatric symptoms. With consideration for the limitations of this field, these results provide evidence that there may be long-term benefits of targeting the gut microbiome as treatment for mood-related disturbances.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** depression (MONDO:0002050), anxiety (MONDO:0005618)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** mood-disturbances (MESH:D019964), disorders of the gastrointestinal tract (MESH:D005770), anxiety (MESH:D001007), depression (MESH:D003866), psychiatric (MESH:D001523)
- **Species:** gut metagenome (species) [taxon 749906]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12833067/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12833067/full.md

## References

59 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12833067/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12833067