# Graduates feedback on the master of public health program in the United Arab Emirates: a mixed method study

## TL;DR

This study evaluates how well a Master of Public Health program in the UAE prepares graduates for careers and identifies areas needing improvement.

## Contribution

The study provides insights into the effectiveness and shortcomings of a specific MPH program in the UAE context.

## Key findings

- Only 32% of graduates experienced career progression after completing the MPH program.
- Participants highlighted a lack of practical training and research opportunities in the program.
- Suggestions include adding a thesis track and expanding coursework in digital health and leadership.

## Abstract

The increasing complexity of public health challenges necessitates well-trained professionals equipped with a diverse range of competencies. The Master of Public Health (MPH) programs play a crucial role in preparing the workforce to address emerging health issues. This study evaluates the MPH program at the Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), to assess its impact on graduates' career progression, competency application, and areas for improvement.

A mixed-methods approach was employed, using an online survey and in-depth interviews with MPH alumni. A structured questionnaire was distributed to 99 graduates, with a response rate of 25% (n = 25). Additionally, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 graduates. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis with NVivo software.

The median age of the participants was 38 years, about 80% of the respondents were female, and 88% were employed full-time. Overall, 52% rated the MPH program as excellent, and 64% reported that it met their expectations. However, only 32% experienced career progression, while 60% faced challenges in securing relevant job opportunities. Research engagement remained low, with only 8% publishing in peer-reviewed journals post-graduation. The participants also identified gaps in practical training, methodological instruction, and research opportunities, suggesting the need for a thesis track, structured internships, and expanded coursework in digital health, policy analysis, and leadership.

While the MPH program at UAEU is well-regarded, improvements in curriculum design, practical training, and research support are necessary to enhance its impact on career advancement and public health practice. Addressing these gaps will better align the program with evolving workforce demands.