# Ormeloxifene Versus Norethisterone for Anovulatory Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: An India-Based Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

**Authors:** Saranya Devi, Hemavathy V, Reenaa Mohan, Arularasan J, Preethi Tamilarasan, Suja Xaviar, Saravanan Vaithiyalingam

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.99971 · Cureus · 2025-12-23

## TL;DR

This study compares ormeloxifene and norethisterone for treating abnormal uterine bleeding and finds ormeloxifene more effective in improving key health outcomes.

## Contribution

The study provides the first India-based meta-analysis comparing ormeloxifene and norethisterone for AUB-O.

## Key findings

- Ormeloxifene significantly improved hemoglobin levels compared to norethisterone.
- It was more effective in reducing endometrial thickness and lowering menstrual blood loss.
- The results show ormeloxifene's superiority in clinical outcomes for AUB-O treatment.

## Abstract

Abnormal uterine bleeding due to ovulatory dysfunction (AUB-O) is a frequent gynecological problem affecting women of reproductive and perimenopausal age. While norethisterone, a synthetic progestogen, has been widely used for medical management, ormeloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, has recently emerged as a promising alternative.

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of ormeloxifene versus norethisterone in the treatment of AUB-O.

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024514294). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and prospective comparative studies evaluating ormeloxifene against norethisterone in women with AUB-O. Outcomes assessed were hemoglobin improvement, reduction in endometrial thickness, and change in Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) score. Data were extracted independently by two authors and analyzed using RevMan 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) with a random-effects model.

Five studies comprising 661 women were included (331 received ormeloxifene; 330 received norethisterone). Ormeloxifene significantly improved hemoglobin levels compared with norethisterone (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.81 g/dL, 95% CI 0.14-1.47; p < 0.00001; I² = 93%). It was also superior in reducing endometrial thickness (SMD = -0.74 mm, 95% CI -1.48 to -0.01; p < 0.00001; I² = 91%) and lowering PBAC scores (SMD = -1.06, 95% CI -1.25 to -0.87; p < 0.00001; I² = 0%).

This meta-analysis suggests that ormeloxifene is more effective than norethisterone in improving clinical outcomes of AUB-O, with better control of menstrual blood loss, hemoglobin levels, and endometrial thickness. Larger, high-quality multicenter trials with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm long-term safety and efficacy.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** ormeloxifene (PubChem CID 35805), norethisterone (PubChem CID 6230)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** ESR1 (estrogen receptor 1) [NCBI Gene 2099] {aka ER, ESR, ESRA, ESTRR, Era, NR3A1}
- **Diseases:** AUB-O (MESH:C535508), ovulatory dysfunction (MESH:D006331), blood loss (MESH:D016063), Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (MESH:D014592)
- **Chemicals:** Ormeloxifene (MESH:C508548), Norethisterone (MESH:D009640)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12831494/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12831494/full.md

## References

24 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12831494/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12831494