# Assessing protected areas as climate refugia for threatened plant species in Britain

**Authors:** Freya R. Read, Rachel J. Warmington, Colin M. Beale, Francesco Boscutti, Francesco Boscutti, Francesco Boscutti

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332485 · PLOS One · 2026-01-23

## TL;DR

This study identifies climate refugia in Britain to protect rare plant species from climate change and highlights the importance of certain geographic features in supporting more species.

## Contribution

The study identifies and compares in situ and ex situ climate refugia for threatened British plant species using future climate projections.

## Key findings

- Many current habitats for rare plants will become unsuitable by 2080, emphasizing the need for refugia protection.
- Protected areas with higher elevation, larger size, and broader elevational ranges support more species as refugia.
- Ex situ refugia are critical for species that cannot move to suitable habitats due to climate change.

## Abstract

Climate change is causing the loss or movement of suitable habitats, forcing species to undergo range shifts. However, many may be unable to move to suitable locations, resulting in increased extinctions. Climate refugia, areas maintaining suitable conditions for species now and in the future, offer protection from climate change. These refugia are categorised as in situ, where species are currently present, and ex situ, where they are not. We aimed to identify climate refugia for rare vascular plant species in Britain and examined whether refugia with the highest number of suitable species share any common features. Using predicted 2080 distributions, we identified protected areas in Britain that act as in situ or ex situ refugia for 12 of Plantlife’s focal plant species. This study revealed that many current habitats will become unsuitable by 2080, highlighting the urgent need to protect refugia. The limited availability of in situ refugia underscores the importance of ex situ refugia as potential habitats. Our findings indicated that protected areas with higher elevations, larger elevational ranges, higher latitude and longitude and larger area will provide climate refugia for a greater number of species. This information can be used to guide the selection and management of protected areas and identify receptor sites for species introductions.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** PAs (MESH:C536411), Ranunculus tripartitus DC (MESH:D054221), PA (MESH:C535387)
- **Chemicals:** Alpine (-)
- **Species:** Mus musculus (house mouse, species) [taxon 10090], Bistorta vivipara (species) [taxon 371026], Silene conica (species) [taxon 39875], Turritis glabra (tower rockcress, species) [taxon 63678], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Galeopsis angustifolia (species) [taxon 457138], Spiranthes romanzoffiana (species) [taxon 126264], Mertensia maritima (species) [taxon 669721], Adonis annua (blood-drops, species) [taxon 212759], Juniperus communis (common juniper, species) [taxon 58039], Cerastium alpinum (species) [taxon 271556]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12829861/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12829861/full.md

## References

75 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12829861/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12829861