Acceptability and Usability of a Digital Medicines Tool for Dental Practitioners in four Southeast Asian Countries
Leanne Teoh, Ruby Biezen, Marietta Taylor, Nadia Kaunein, Wendy Thompson, Charlene Goh, Jacob Chew, Yuniardini Septorini Wimardhani, Mohd Hafiz Arzmi, Wan NurHazirah Wan Ahmad Kamil, Sireerat Sooampon, Benjar Issaranggun Na Ayuthaya, Michael McCullough

TL;DR
A digital tool for dental prescribing was tested in four Southeast Asian countries and found to be acceptable and usable, though improvements like local databases and mobile access are needed.
Contribution
The study evaluates a dental-specific drug tool in multiple Southeast Asian countries, highlighting its usability and the need for localization.
Findings
Most participants found MIMS Drugs4dent improved their ability to prescribe according to guidelines.
Participants reported the tool was easy to use and allowed quick access to information.
A preference for local drug databases and mobile versions was identified to enhance usability.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is a global public health emergency and a prominent issue in Southeast Asia. There is also a lack of dental-specific drug resources to assist with medication management for dentists. Our dental-specific decision support tool, MIMS Drugs4dent, was developed to assist Australian dentists optimize their prescribing. The aim of this study was to trial MIMS Drugs4dent for acceptability and usability with dental practitioners in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand. This was a cross-sectional study of MIMS Drugs4dent with dental practitioners in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand. Dental practitioners were provided access to MIMS Drugs4dent for 1 month. After the intervention period, participants completed an online survey that assessed their perceptions of the tool. The primary outcome was the acceptability and usability of MIMS Drugs4dent, using…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Electronic Health Records Systems
