Correction to: Singular adaptations in the carbon assimilation mechanism of the polyextremophile cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis thermalis
Pere Aguiló-Nicolau, Jeroni Galmés, Giacomo Fais, Sebastià Capó-Bauçà, Giacomo Cao, Concepción Íñiguez
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms · Algal biology and biofuel production · Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
Correction to: Photosynthesis Research (2023) 156:231–245
10.1007/s11120-023-01008-y
The original article has been corrected. In this article Fig. 2 appeared as:
Fig. 2. Net photosynthetic rate (An) in Synechococcus sp. PCC6301 (white) and Chroococcidiopsis thermalis KOMAREK 1964/111 (grey) at 20 °C under ambient air (0.04% CO_2_, LC, empty pattern) or 2.5% CO_2_—enriched air (HC, line pattern) and saturating irradiance (300 µmol photons m^− 2^ s^− 1^). Values are means ± standard deviation of 10 replicates. Different letters denote significant differences among different strains and CO_2_ treatments (P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test or Kruskal-Wallis test followed with Bonferroni correction for non-parametric data)
but should have appeared as:
Fig. 2. Net photosynthetic rate (An) in Synechococcus sp. PCC6301 (white) and Chroococcidiopsis thermalis KOMAREK 1964/111 (grey) at 20 °C under ambient air (0.04% CO_2_, LC, empty pattern) or 2.5% CO_2_—enriched air (HC, line pattern) and saturating irradiance (300 µmol photons m^− 2^ s^− 1^). Values are means ± standard deviation of 10 replicates. Different letters denote significant differences among different strains and CO_2_ treatments (P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test or Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Bonferroni correction for non-parametric data)
Correspondingly, the Results section of the paper has also been updated. The paragraph under Characterization and effectiveness of CO2 concentrating mechanisms in Synechococcus sp. and C. thermalis - Net photosynthesis and effect of CCM inhibitors.
was originally published as:
Net photosynthetic rate (An) from C. thermalis and Synechococcus sp. under LC did not differ, averaging 47.7 µmol O_2_ h^− 1^ mg^− 1^ DW. On the contrary, An from both species under HC (Fig. 2) showed significantly higher values for Synechococcus sp. than for C. thermalis (60.2 and 46.9 µmol O_2_ h^− 1^ mg^− 1^ DW, respectively). Hence, the An of Synechococcus sp. under HC was higher than under LC, whereas no differences in An of C. thermalis were observed between CO_2_ treatments.
and has been corrected to:
Net photosynthetic rate (An) in C. thermalis was similar under both HC and LC, averaging ~ 0.9 µmol O_2_ h^− 1^ mg^− 1^ DW (Fig. 2). In contrast, Synechococcus sp. showed a ~ two-fold higher An under HC than under LC, with Synechococcus sp. LC exhibiting the lowest An among all species-treatment combinations.