Model for concomitant pulmonary embolism in a deep vein thrombosis patient
Saad Ahmad, Rayyan Ali

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management · Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms · Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
We read the article “A Predictive Model for Early Detection of Concomitant Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis Immediately Upon Hospital Admission” by Gong et al,1 which discusses about early interventions that could be done to determine if a patient has a pulmonary embolism (PE), who is previously diagnosed with deep venous thrombosis (DVT). To address this, it further focuses on reducing the unnecessary computed tomography pulmonary angiography and decreasing the economic burden for patients.
As we further explore the role of detection of concomitant PE in patients with DVT, in cases where a patient presents to the doctor with an already diagnosed DVT, clinicians previously relied on the suspicion of PE from patient's gender, cardiovascular diseases, fracture, age, D-dimer levels, fractures, and iliac vein compression. However, Gong et al created a tool called the nomogram, which demonstrated superior predictive accuracy (about 72.7%) compared with the Wells score, which has a lower accuracy than the nomogram in raising suspicion of PE. The Wells score is based on the clinical suspicion of PE in a patient with DVT; however, machine learning approaches now offer enhanced diagnostic precision over traditional use of the Wells score, increasing accuracy to approximately 80%. Moreover, another advantage of machine learning is that it can be programmed into data systems in the electronic health record, which would be more helpful in early diagnosis, alerting the doctor about the possibility of a PE so that appropriate management and treatment plans can be made. The feasibility of this integration is demonstrated in a study by Zhou et al.2
In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights about how machine learning has provided a more valuable tool that enables timely prediction and alerts doctors about the possibility of a PE, which can help doctors to institute an appropriate treatment plan. By enabling earlier detection of key health indicators, this approach has the potential to decrease patient mortality and improve overall outcomes.
Funding
None.
Disclosures
None.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Gong M.Jiang R.Guo K.A predictive model for early detection of concomitant pulmonary embolism in patients with deep vein thrombosis immediately upon hospital admission J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 13202510229910.1016/j.jvsv.2025.102299 PMC 1244169840752891 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Zhou Q Huang R Xiong X Prediction of pulmonary embolism by an explainable machine learning approach in the real world Sci Rep 15202583510.1038/s 4159802475435939755685 PMC 11700180 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
