Beyond Effectiveness: Impact of Cladribine on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life in Latin American Populations With Multiple Sclerosis
Bernardita Soler, Claudia Cárcamo, Juan De La Barra, Irene Treviño-Frenk, Adriana Carra, Alejandra Martinez, Patricio Correa, Adolfo Del Canto, Carolina Pelayo, Lorena Garcia, Ana Reyes, Macarena Vasquez, Ethel Ciampi

TL;DR
This study shows that cladribine is effective and safe for treating multiple sclerosis in Latin American patients, improving their quality of life and reducing disease activity.
Contribution
The study provides real-world evidence of cladribine's effectiveness and safety in Latin American populations with multiple sclerosis.
Findings
Cladribine significantly reduced annualized relapse rates in patients with multiple sclerosis over four years.
A majority of patients achieved no evidence of disease activity-3 (NEDA-3) in all four years of treatment.
Cladribine improved patient-reported outcomes, including visual memory, verbal memory, and anxiety levels.
Abstract
Background: This multicenter, prospective, observational study evaluated the real-world effectiveness, safety, and impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and functionality of cladribine (CLAD) in 167 relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) patients from Chile, Mexico, Argentina, and Ecuador between 2019 and 2024. Methods: Patients were assessed for clinical relapses, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, and disability progression. A subgroup underwent additional cognitive, motor, and PRO evaluations. Results: The annualized relapse rate (ARR) significantly decreased from 0.65 ± 0.6 pre-treatment to 0.12 ± 0.4 in year one, 0.08 ± 0.3 in year two, 0.06 ± 0.3 in year three, and 0.15 ± 0.5 in year four. No evidence of disease activity-3 (NEDA-3) was achieved by 68% (n = 100/147), 77% (n = 89/115), 86% (n = 61/71), and 82% (n = 37/45) of patients in years one, two, three, and four,…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies · Epilepsy research and treatment · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
