Length of hospital stay after uncomplicated gastrectomy in the Netherlands: a nationwide cohort study
Maurits R. Visser, Daan M. Voeten, Suzanne S. Gisbertz, Jelle. P. Ruurda, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Richard van Hillegersberg, Boudewijn van Etten, Boudewijn van Etten, J. Heisterkamp, Sjoerd M. Lagarde, Misha D. P. Luyer, Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen, J. P. Pierie

TL;DR
This study finds that hospital stay length after uncomplicated stomach surgery in the Netherlands varies by hospital and is influenced by surgery type and patient age, but not by readmission risk.
Contribution
The study identifies hospital-level and patient-specific factors affecting hospital stay after uncomplicated gastrectomy in the Netherlands.
Findings
Hospital variation in length of stay after uncomplicated gastrectomy was significant, with some hospitals discharging patients earlier.
Open surgery and age over 75 were linked to longer stays, while subtotal gastrectomy was linked to shorter stays.
Early discharge was not associated with increased 30-day readmission risk.
Abstract
Longer length of hospital stay (LOS) has an impact on patient lives and hospital costs. As 60%–70% of gastrectomies are uncomplicated, identifying factors influencing LOS after uncomplicated gastrectomy could help reduce LOS. This study examined hospital variation in LOS and its association with readmission after uncomplicated gastrectomy. Patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the Netherlands were included from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA). Patients with any complications (Gastric Complications Consensus Group definitions) were excluded. LOS was dichotomized around the national median into early and late discharge. Hospital variation was investigated using (case-mix corrected) funnel plots. The association of LOS with patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics and 30-day readmission were investigated using multilevel multivariable logistic…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes · Esophageal and GI Pathology · Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
