# Between fiscal returns and social harm: reframing gambling regulation in Kazakhstan through international evidence

## TL;DR

This paper examines Kazakhstan's gambling reforms and compares them with international practices to suggest policy improvements.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a sociolegal framework to evaluate gambling regulation in Kazakhstan using comparative international evidence.

## Key findings

- Kazakhstan's legal gambling market expanded in 2024 with reduced criminal cases for illegal gambling.
- The country increased coverage of exclusion instruments but still faces a large offshore online gambling segment.
- Comparative analysis shows Kazakhstan combines strict advertising controls with a complex tax system.

## Abstract

Background Since 2007, Kazakhstan has gradually modernized gambling regulation and in 2023–2024 enacted major reforms, including the creation of a specialized regulator, tighter advertising rules, expanded exclusion regimes, and stronger criminal enforcement. Objective: To assess how this evolving regulatory model aligns with international practice and to derive evidence-informed policy options, treating gambling law as a sociolegal regime for allocating gambling-related risks and fiscal rents. Methods: We use an exploratory sociolegal mixed-methods design that combines doctrinal and comparative legal analysis with a descriptive synthesis of 2019–2024 official statistics on market size, taxation, enforcement, and harm-reduction proxies. Results Kazakhstan’s legal gambling market expanded further in 2024, recorded criminal cases for illegal gambling declined, and coverage of debtor-based and voluntary self-exclusion instruments increased sharply, while a large offshore online segment persisted. Situating these trends within a comparative coding of the United Kingdom, Spain, and Italy, we show that Kazakhstan combines strict advertising controls, extensive exclusion tools, and advanced enforcement technologies with a comparatively heavy and complex tax mix and a regulator located within a line ministry. Conclusion A public-health-oriented configuration of instruments appears normatively most consistent with the dual goals of channeling demand into the legal market and mitigating gambling-related harm, but the available data remain descriptive and the post-reform observation window is short. We discuss incremental policy options regarding taxation, regulator autonomy, harm reduction, and cross-border enforcement.