# Predictors of achieving a textbook outcome following robotic left-sided pancreatectomy: multicentre analysis

**Authors:** Abdullah K Malik, Bhargav Chikkala, Claire Ramage, Samuel J Tingle, Jason Kho, Zaed Hamady, Ali Arshad, Hassaan Bari, Andrea Sheel, Ryan Baron, Declan Dunne, Timothy Pencaval, Rajiv Lahiri, Daniel Hughes, Michael Silva, Zahir Soonawalla, Ricky Bhogal, Jeremy J French, Jose M Ramia, Jawad Ahmad, Steven A White, Sanjay Pandanaboyana, Abdullah K Malik, Abdullah K Malik, Bhargav Chikkala, Zaed Hamady, Ali Arshad, Hassaan Bari, Andrea Sheel, Ryan Baron, Declan Dunne, Timothy Pencaval, Rajiv Lahiri, Michael Silva, Zahir Soonawalla, Ricky Bhogal, Jeremy J French, Jawad Ahmad, Steven A White, Sanjay Pandanaboyana

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf142 · BJS Open · 2026-01-21

## TL;DR

This study examines factors influencing successful outcomes after robotic left-sided pancreatectomy in UK hospitals.

## Contribution

The study identifies predictors of textbook outcomes in robotic left-sided pancreatectomy across learning and proficiency phases.

## Key findings

- Textbook outcomes were achieved in 51.2% of patients with no significant difference between learning and proficiency phases.
- Longer operative time and male sex were linked to lower odds of textbook outcomes.
- Higher preoperative haemoglobin and increasing age were associated with better outcomes.

## Abstract

Recent Brescia guidelines suggest proficiency in robotic left-sided pancreatectomy (RLP) occurs after the first 21 cases (competency phase). This study reports textbook outcome (TO) rates in the competency and proficiency phases following RLP, and predictors of achieving TO.

A retrospective cohort study of all RLP procedures from six UK centres was undertaken from July 2014 to August 2024. TO was defined as a composite of hospital length of stay, major morbidity, in-hospital mortality, 90-day readmission, and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to model predictors of TO.

In all, 281 patients underwent RLP. The median number of laparoscopic left-sided pancreatectomies undertaken before starting the RLP programme was 70 (interquartile range 40–175) per centre. In all, 109 patients underwent RLP in the competency phase and 172 underwent RLP in the proficiency phase; TO was achieved in 57 patients (52.3%) and 86 patients (50.0%), respectively (P = 0.801). Major morbidity occurred in 38 patients (13.5%), 68 patients were readmitted within 90 days (24.2%), and 57 patients had CR-POPF (20.3%). Patients in the proficiency phase had a longer operating time (315 versus 230 minutes; P < 0.0001), a lower rate of splenic preservation (23 versus 27; P = 0.023), and a lower rate of vascular infiltration (12 versus 22; P = 0.002) than patients in the competency phase. TO was less likely with a prolonged operation time (odds ratio 0.82 per hour; 95% c.i. 0.70 to 0.95; P = 0.010) with a non-linear trend noted.

TO after RLP was achieved in half the resected patients in this UK series. There was no difference in the TO rate between the competency and proficiency phases, and previous experience with laparoscopic left-sided pancreatectomy may have contributed to this.

This multicentre UK study evaluated predictors of achieving a textbook outcome (TO) following robotic left-sided pancreatectomy (RLP), comparing results between the learning (competency) and proficiency phases. TO was achieved in 51.2% of patients, with no significant difference between phases. Longer operative time and male sex were associated with reduced odds of achieving a TO, whereas increasing age and higher preoperative haemoglobin were positive predictors of a TO.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** postoperative pancreatic fistula (MESH:D010185)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12822603/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12822603/full.md

## References

29 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12822603/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12822603