# Digital vs. Direct Anthropometry with MetiSmile® 3D Face Scanner: A Validation and Reliability Study on a Mannequin Model

**Authors:** Alexander De Crem, Constantijn Bogaert, Frederik Piccart, Matthias Ureel, Benjamin Denoiseux, Lisa De Kock, Marieke Brands, Olivier Lenssen, Renaat Coopman

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/cmtr19010003 · Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction · 2025-12-30

## TL;DR

The MetiSmile® 3D face scanner is a reliable and affordable alternative to conventional systems for facial measurements, with results comparable to direct measurements.

## Contribution

This study validates the MetiSmile® 3D face scanner's accuracy and reproducibility using a mannequin model.

## Key findings

- The MetiSmile® scanner produced highly reproducible 3D meshes with RMS values below 0.05 mm.
- Digital and direct anthropometry measurements showed excellent agreement with ICCs ≥ 0.997.
- Mean absolute differences between digital and direct measurements were 0.25–0.33 mm, clinically acceptable.

## Abstract

Background: Three-dimensional facial anthropometry is increasingly used in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Conventional face scanning systems such as Vectra® and 3dMD® are well validated but remain costly and technically demanding. The MetiSmile® 3D face scanner provides a more affordable and portable alternative, yet its accuracy and reproducibility have not been rigorously evaluated. Methods: Validation was performed on a standardized mannequin head in two phases. Phase 1 assessed mesh reproducibility under artificial lighting (AL), natural lighting (n-AL), and after mesh-refinement (AL-F). Landmark-based pre-registration with Iterative Closest Point refinement was applied; root-mean-square error (RMS) and distance maps were calculated. In phase 2, three observers (student, resident, consultant) performed 14 predefined linear measurements by direct anthropometry (DA) and digital anthropometry (DiA). Intra- and inter-observer reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: Phase 1 yielded mean RMS values of 0.041 mm (AL), 0.043 mm (n-AL), and 0.030 mm (AL-F), with largest deviations near eyes, alar regions, and lip commissures. Phase 2 showed excellent ICCs (≥0.997) and mean absolute DA–DiA differences of 0.25–0.33 mm, with only few differences > 2 mm. Conclusion: The MetiSmile® scanner generates highly reproducible meshes and clinically acceptable linear measurements on mannequin models. Further validation on live subjects is warranted before routine clinical application.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12821616/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12821616/full.md

## References

25 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12821616/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12821616