# Bispecific Antibodies: Strategies Available to Optimize Their Safe Delivery in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

**Authors:** Hannah Victoria Giles, Bhuvan Kishore

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/antib15010005 · Antibodies · 2026-01-05

## TL;DR

This paper reviews strategies to safely deliver bispecific antibodies for treating multiple myeloma, focusing on managing toxicities and infections.

## Contribution

The paper provides a comprehensive review of strategies to optimize the safe delivery of bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma patients.

## Key findings

- Bispecific antibodies are being explored for earlier treatment lines in multiple myeloma with promising results.
- Strategies like tocilizumab prophylaxis may help reduce hospitalization during initial dosing phases.
- Infection prophylaxis is crucial for minimizing non-relapse mortality in patients receiving bispecific antibodies.

## Abstract

Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have emerged as an important new class drugs for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) over the last few years. Currently, BsAbs are only licensed for use as monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory MM who have had at least three prior lines of treatment and are triple class-exposed (patients who have received an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, an immunodulatory drug, and a proteasome inhibitor). However, their use in earlier lines, including in the upfront setting, is being explored in multiple ongoing clinical trials with promising early results. The BsAbs have specific toxicities, including a high rate of low-grade cytokine release syndrome and, less commonly, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. These immune-related toxicities occur almost exclusively during the initiation phase of the BsAbs. This has led to frequent hospitalization of patients for the duration of the initial step-up dosing phase. Strategies that could facilitate outpatient step-up dosing, such as tocilizumab prophylaxis, will become even more critical if BsAbs move into earlier lines of treatment and are used in larger numbers of patients. Optimizing infection prophylaxis is critical for ensuring the safe delivery of BsAbs as infection is the leading cause of non-relapse mortality in patients being treated with BsAbs. Multiple strategies to minimize the infection risk, including antimicrobial prophylaxis, immunoglobulin replacement, vaccination and reduced dosing frequency, have been evaluated. The clinical data on the efficacy of these supportive measures are described in this review article alongside the available strategies for mitigating and managing CRS and ICANS.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** multiple myeloma (MONDO:0009693)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CD38 (CD38 molecule) [NCBI Gene 952] {aka ADPRC 1, ADPRC1, cADPR1}
- **Diseases:** CRS (MESH:D003398), toxicities (MESH:D064420), neurotoxicity (MESH:D020258), MM (MESH:D009101), infection (MESH:D007239)
- **Chemicals:** tocilizumab (MESH:C502936)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12821579/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12821579/full.md

## References

65 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12821579/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12821579