# Impact of Social Determinants of Health in the Treatment of Closed Nasal Bone Fractures

**Authors:** Nicholas A. Frisco, Nicholas W. Clark, Kayla W. Kilpatrick, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, David B. Powers, Charles R. Woodard, Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters, Dane M. Barrett

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/cmtr19010004 · Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction · 2026-01-08

## TL;DR

This study found that social factors like race and insurance type affect the likelihood of receiving treatment for nasal bone fractures.

## Contribution

The study identifies disparities in closed nasal bone reduction rates linked to social determinants of health.

## Key findings

- Older patients and non-White patients were less likely to undergo closed nasal bone reduction.
- Patients with government insurance or no insurance had lower odds of receiving the procedure compared to those with private insurance.

## Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To determine the association of social determinants of health with rates of closed nasal bone reduction. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2011 to 2019 was performed, including only adult patients with isolated nasal bone fractures. Logistic regression modeling was used to estimate the association between closed nasal bone reduction and sociodemographic variables. Results: A total of 149,312 patients were included, with an average age of 50. Most patients were male (68%), White (72%), and non-Hispanic/Latino (77%), with Medicare insurance (25%). Most patients were cared for at non-university (54%) and non-profit hospitals (88%). A total of 39% were cared for at an ACS level 1 trauma center. Finally, 3.3% of the patients in this study underwent closed reduction. The odds of undergoing reduction decreased with increasing age (OR: 0.99, CI: (0.99, 0.99)). Compared to White patients, Asian and Black/African American patients had decreased odds of closed reduction (Asian: OR (CI) 0.71 (0.53, 0.95); Black: OR (CI): 0.71 (0.65, 0.79)). Patients with government insurance or who were uninsured had lower odds of closed reduction compared to private/commercial insurance, with Medicaid, Medicare, and not billed/self-pay odds ratios of 0.83 (CI: (0.76, 0.90)), 0.81 (CI: (0.73, 0.89)), and 0.79 (CI: (0.72, 0.86)), respectively. Conclusions: Social determinants of health are associated with differential rates of inpatient closed nasal bone reduction. Further studies in the outpatient setting are needed to determine if these associations remain consistent.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** bone (MESH:D001847), Trauma (MESH:D014947), Nasal Bone Fractures (MESH:D050723)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12821397/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12821397/full.md

## References

43 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12821397/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12821397