# Cue-weighting in processing of prosodic boundaries in Dutch: An event-related potential (ERP) study

**Authors:** Jorik Geutjes, Rachida Ganga, Elanie van Niekerk, Victoria Reshetnikova, Aoju Chen

PMC · DOI: 10.3758/s13423-025-02843-x · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · 2026-01-20

## TL;DR

This study shows that pauses are most important for understanding sentence breaks in Dutch, unlike in English and German.

## Contribution

The study identifies pause as the critical cue for prosodic boundary processing in Dutch coordinated constructions.

## Key findings

- The Closure Positive Shift (CPS) was elicited only when a pause was present, regardless of pitch or lengthening.
- Without a pause, no CPS was observed even if pitch and lengthening cues were present.
- Pause is more crucial for Dutch than for English or German in processing prosodic boundaries.

## Abstract

Across languages, major prosodic boundaries, such as intonational phrase (henceforth, IP) boundaries, are typically signalled via three types of prosodic cues, namely pitch change, final lengthening, and pause. However, the relative weight of each cue in the perception of IP boundaries differs across languages. Little is known about which cues are important in Dutch. This study investigates cue-weighting during processing of IP boundaries in Dutch by examining the effects of varying combinations of cues on the neurophysiological correlate of boundary processing, i.e., the Closure Positive Shift (CPS). Twenty-five native speakers of Dutch listened to renditions of a name sequence, connected by the coordinating conjunction en (‘and’), i.e., Moni en Lilli en Manu, with or without an IP boundary after the second name. Event-related potential (ERP) results showed that the CPS was elicited by IP boundaries if a pause was present, regardless of whether pitch rise or final lengthening was omitted. In contrast, no CPS was observed when the pause cue was absent, even if both the other two cues were present. Together, these findings suggest that pause has a crucial role in the processing of IP boundaries in Dutch coordinated constructions, thereby differing from findings previously reported for the other West Germanic languages such as English and German.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13423-025-02843-x.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** CPS (MESH:D015812), neurological, psychiatric, hearing or language impairments (MESH:D001523)
- **Chemicals:** BioSemi (-), AgCl (MESH:C037548), Ag (MESH:D012834)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Microbacterium sp. O (species) [taxon 2502250], Meleagris gallopavo (common turkey, species) [taxon 9103]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12819481/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12819481/full.md

## References

11 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12819481/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12819481