# Drawing cancer chronicles: A qualitative study to evaluate narrative meaning-making over time and in response to a meaning-centred care intervention

**Authors:** Emily R.E. Evans, Niels van Poecke, Maite Portela, Michael Scherer-Rath, Yvonne Weeseman, Zarah M. Bood, Nirav Christophe, Henny Dörr, Judith de Vos-Geelen, Aart Beeker, Gerty de Klerk, Eric Bras, Hugo Vlug, Frans Bossink, Frans Savelkoul, Liesbeth M. Timmermans, Mirjam A.G. Sprangers, Esther Helmich, Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341150 · PLOS One · 2026-01-20

## TL;DR

This study explores how people with incurable cancer use visual storytelling to cope with their diagnosis and how an arts-based intervention helps them create new life narratives.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel method using hand-drawn visual narratives to track narrative meaning-making over time and in response to a care intervention.

## Key findings

- Participants used six strategies (repeating, retaining, repurposing, reinforcing, reducing, reassembling) to reconstruct their narratives.
- Arts-based intervention participants developed new ways of narrating and relating to cancer as a disruptive life event.
- Repeated use of Rich Pictures is a valuable method for evaluating and developing meaning-centred care in oncology.

## Abstract

The diagnosis of incurable cancer can disrupt life stories, undermining meaning-making and challenging self-identity. People may therefore need to search for and create new stories about their lives that incorporate their diagnosis. Arts-based narrative interventions are being explored to support this existential process of narrative meaning-making. However, developing effective existential support may be limited by the lack of methods capable of investigating their impact. This study is the first to explore narrative meaning-making across time and a meaning-centred care intervention by longitudinally using ‘Rich Pictures’ (RPs) – hand-drawn visual narratives. We analysed repeated RPs about living with incurable cancer from thirty-eight participants in two studies: one incorporating an arts-based narrative intervention, and one without. RPs were compared across time and the two groups using an inductive, multi-level, and participatory analysis approach. Our findings highlighted six strategies variably used by participants to reconstruct their narratives over time: repeating, retaining, repurposing, reinforcing, reducing, and reassembling. Differences were found in the employment of these strategies between the two different studies, with arts-based intervention participants predominantly developing new ways of narrating and relating to cancer as a disruptive life event. We conclude that people living with incurable cancer employ a range of strategies in reconstructing their narratives. Arts-based interventions may support this existential process. The repeated use of RPs is a valuable method for investigating narrative meaning-making over time, across groups, and interventions, offering insights to evaluate and develop meaning-centred care in oncology.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** cancer (MONDO:0004992)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** cancer (MESH:D009369)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12818685/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12818685/full.md

## References

39 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12818685/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12818685