Comment on “Risk factors associated with the use of red blood cells in elective cardiac surgeries”
Hinpetch Daungsupawong, Viroj Wiwanitkit

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlood transfusion and management · Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis · Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Dear Editor,
We herein discuss the publication on “Risk factors associated with the use of red blood cells in elective cardiac surgeries: A patient blood management (PBM) view”. [1] This article investigates the risk variables linked with the use of packed red blood cells (PRBC) in patients undergoing elective heart surgery in Brazil.
While stepwise logistic regression results show that female gender, poor hematocrit level, diabetes, and extracorporeal circulation duration of more than 90 min are significant risk variables, this analysis is statistically limited. As this is a retrospective study, it is susceptible to bias from data collection or sample selection. Furthermore, stepwise logistic regression may result in overfitting and variable selection based on the specific data set, restricting its applicability to other hospitals or populations.
Furthermore, underlying heart disease severity, changes in surgeon treatment, surgical technique, or anticoagulant use can all have an impact on the accuracy of the outcomes as these variables may not be recorded or controlled in the analysis. Furthermore, the identification of female gender as a high-risk factor could be explained by variations in body weight or total blood volume, however the paper did not account for these variables in its analysis. This may confound the relationship.
New interpretations may concentrate on synthesizing findings for PBM guidelines. Preoperative hematocrit assessment and improvement of anemia, diabetes management, and surgical planning to limit cardiopulmonary bypass time can all help to lessen the requirement for PRBC. Furthermore, including risk prediction models that take into account characteristics such as gender, body weight, disease severity, and laboratory results might improve accuracy and simplify effective blood use planning.
To broaden the topic, consider the following research questions:
- 1)Can this retrospective study be transformed into a prospective or multicenter study to corroborate the relationship?
- 2)How much can enhancing PBM with preoperative optimization techniques reduce PRBC use and clinical outcomes?
- 3)How do individual characteristics, such as body mass index and female gender, affect overall blood volume?
- 4)Can multivariate machine learning algorithms accurately predict the requirement for PRBC in cardiac surgery patients?
These questions may lead to applicable research as well as safe, resource-saving strategies in Brazil's health-care system.
Data availability statement
there Is no new data generated
Funding statement
there is no funding
Ethics of approval statement
not applicable
Patient consent statement
not applicable
Permission to reproduce material from other sources
not applicable
Clinical trial registration
not applicable
Author contributions
HP 50 % ideas, writing, analyzing, approval
VW 50 % ideas, supervision, approval
AI declaration
the authors use computation tool in language checking and editing.
Conflicts of interest
the authors declare no conflict of interest
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Souza T.M.Miranda C.L.Castro A.B.Garcia-Bonichini P.C.Risk factors associated with the use of red blood cells in elective cardiac surgeries: a patient blood management (PBM) view Hematol Transfus Cell Ther.4742025 Sep 1710398710.1016/j.htct.2025.103987 Online ahead of print PMC 1247792940966829 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
