Correction: Metallic phase enabling Mos2 nanosheets as an efficient sonosensitizer for photothermal‑enhanced sonodynamic antibacterial therapy

Abstract

Figures

c. Accordingly, the following sentence was updated to follow: “After US (1.0 MHz, 1.5 W cm^−2^, 50% duty cycle) and laser (1064 nm, 1 W cm^−2^) irradiation for 3 min, the bacteriostatic rate of PVP-modified M-MoS_2_ (50 ppm) reached 18% and 20% for *P. aeruginosa* (43.9% and 21.4% for* S. aureus*), respectively (Fig. 4b and d).” The image of Masson Staining of the control was replaced in Fig. S8. The correction of this information does not affect the results and conclusions of this paper. The final Fig. 4 and Fig. S8 are shown as follows:

c. Accordingly, the following sentence was updated to follow: “After US (1.0 MHz, 1.5 W cm^−2^, 50% duty cycle) and laser (1064 nm, 1 W cm^−2^) irradiation for 3 min, the bacteriostatic rate of PVP-modified M-MoS_2_ (50 ppm) reached 18% and 20% for *P. aeruginosa* (43.9% and 21.4% for* S. aureus*), respectively (Fig. 4b and d).” The image of Masson Staining of the control was replaced in Fig. S8. The correction of this information does not affect the results and conclusions of this paper. The final Fig. 4 and Fig. S8 are shown as follows:

Full text

Correction: Journal of Nanobiotechnology (2022) 20:136

10.1186/s12951-022-01344-6

Following publication of the original article (10.1186/s12951-022-01344-6), the authors identified an error in Fig. 4c and Fig. S8. The details are shown as follows.

The images of S. aureus Only and S. aureus MoS2 Only of the control were replaced in Figure 4c. Accordingly, the following sentence was updated to follow: “After US (1.0 MHz, 1.5 W cm^−2^, 50% duty cycle) and laser (1064 nm, 1 W cm^−2^) irradiation for 3 min, the bacteriostatic rate of PVP-modified M-MoS_2_ (50 ppm) reached 18% and 20% for P. aeruginosa (43.9% and 21.4% for S. aureus), respectively (Fig. 4b and d).” The image of Masson Staining of the control was replaced in Fig. S8. The correction of this information does not affect the results and conclusions of this paper. The final Fig. 4 and Fig. S8 are shown as follows:

Incorrect Fig. 4

Correct Fig. 4

Fig. 4. Photographs of bacterial colonies formed by P. aureus (a) and S. aureus (c) after treating with PBS (control), PBS + US, PBS + Laser, PBS + US + Laser, M-MoS2, M-MoS2 + US, M-MoS2 + Laser, M-MoS2 + US + Laser. b, d The bacterial survival from the bacterial colonies in a, c (Student’s two-tailed t-test, ***p < 0.001). e The SEM images of S. aureus bacterial treated with different treatments

Incorrect Fig. S8

Correct Fig. S8

Fig. S8Gram, masson trichrome, and hematoxylin–eosin (H&E) and staining of wound tissues after exposure to different treatment (PBS, M-MoS2, M-MoS2 + Laser, M-MoS2 + US, and M-MoS2 + Laser + US) for 10 days