Adherence to Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol for Chest Pain in Five Emergency Departments in Canada
Jesse Hill, Esther Yang, Shandra Doran, Michelle M. Graham, Sean van Diepen, Joshua E. Raizman, Albert KY Tsui, Brian H. Rowe

TL;DR
This study found that emergency physicians in Canadian hospitals often fail to follow a chest pain protocol, leading to worse outcomes for some patients, especially women.
Contribution
The study evaluates protocol adherence for chest pain assessment in emergency departments and links non-adherence to adverse outcomes.
Findings
Only 35.9% of patients adhered to the chest pain protocol, with significant variation by risk group.
Non-adherent care was associated with higher rates of adverse cardiac events in patients with intermediate troponin levels.
Male patients were more likely to receive protocol-adherent care compared to female patients.
Abstract
In this study we sought to to assess the extent to which emergency physicians adhered to an institutional protocol for rapid chest pain assessment that incorporates a high sensitivity troponin I (hs-TnI) assay. We also sought to characterize clinical outcomes stratified by protocol adherence. We conducted a retrospective cohort study that included all adult patients presenting to five major metropolitan hospital emergency departments (ED) with suspected cardiac chest pain who had at least one troponin measured. The study period was November 9, 2020–June 20, 2022. The primary outcome was protocol adherence for indeterminate-risk and high-risk patients, as defined by the protocol in use at the time of each patient’s presentation to hospital. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) are reported with associated 95% confidence intervals. A total of 14,027 patients were included in the study, among whom…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research · Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics · Cardiac Health and Mental Health
