Bone cement-augmented vs. conventional pedicle screws for osteoporotic lumbar spondylolisthesis: a meta-analysis
Guoyi Qin, Lihui Hu, Zhaoming Liang, Jinghuai Li, Xiaohang Bao, Shaohu Lin, Yicheng Wang, Yuanming Zhong

TL;DR
Bone cement-augmented screws improve outcomes for osteoporotic spinal patients compared to conventional screws, with no major safety risks.
Contribution
A systematic meta-analysis comparing bone cement-augmented and conventional pedicle screws in osteoporotic lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Findings
Bone cement-augmented screws significantly reduce pain and disability scores in patients.
They improve intervertebral space height and fusion rates while reducing screw loosening.
Operation time is longer, but no significant differences in bleeding or complications are observed.
Abstract
In patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis complicated by osteoporosis, conventional pedicle screw internal fixation often leads to complications such as screw loosening and fixation failure due to low bone mineral density. Bone cement-augmented pedicle screw technology has been widely used to enhance screw stability; however, its efficacy and safety in lumbar spondylolisthesis lack systematic evaluation. To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of bone cement-augmented pedicle screws vs. conventional pedicle screws in the treatment of osteoporotic lumbar spondylolisthesis. Relevant literatures were retrieved from databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMbase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed from their inception to July 2025. Retrospective cohort studies or randomized controlled trials were included. Two researchers independently screened…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology · Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
