Understanding knowledge, beliefs, values and barriers towards cervical cancer screening and self-sampling amongst migrant Muslim women in Southwest London: an in-depth qualitative interview study
Sophie Webb, Nafeesa Mat Ali, Yolanda Augustin, Sally E Hayward, Anna Deal, Alison Crawshaw, Henry Staines, Kevin Hayes, Sally Hargreaves, Sanjeev Krishna

TL;DR
This study explores migrant Muslim women's views on cervical cancer screening and self-sampling in London, finding that while acceptable, barriers like cultural taboos and language gaps need addressing.
Contribution
The study provides novel insights into the acceptability of HPV self-sampling among migrant Muslim women and identifies culturally specific barriers and solutions.
Findings
44% of migrant Muslim women preferred self-sampling over healthcare worker-taken samples due to concerns about technique.
Participants showed increased openness to self-sampling after experiencing respiratory swabs during the pandemic.
Cultural taboos and lack of understanding about HPV and screening were identified as major barriers.
Abstract
Novel screening methods are needed to increase access to cervical screening, and migrant Muslim women in the UK are particularly at risk of screening non-attendance. In anticipation of the introduction of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) self-sampling into the UK programme, this study explored views of migrant Muslim women in southwest London on understanding of cervical screening, barriers and motivators to engagement and acceptability of vaginal self-sampling. Qualitative in-depth semi-structured individual interviews were carried out via MS Teams video call of 18 Muslim migrant women, with purposive and snowball recruitment. Framework analysis was carried out using NVivo 14 and coding matrix developed using MS Excel. Migrant Muslim women felt that self-sampling for hrHPV was likely acceptable and beneficial for some women in their community. Only 44% preferred self-sampling…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCervical Cancer and HPV Research · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Women's cancer prevention and management
