The impact and return-on-investment of evidence-based practice in conservation and environmental management: A machine learning-assisted scoping review protocol

TL;DR

This paper outlines a scoping review protocol to assess the impact and return-on-investment of evidence-based practice in conservation and environmental management.

Contribution

The study introduces a machine learning-assisted scoping review to evaluate evidence-based practice in conservation, a novel approach in this field.

Findings

The review will use machine learning tools like ASReview and SysRev to analyze literature on evidence-based practice in conservation.

It will cover literature from 1992 to 2025 without geographical or language restrictions.

The findings aim to inform practitioners about the benefits and costs of evidence-based practice in conservation.

Abstract

Evidence-based Practice (EBP) is a vital principle, with its origins in the 1970s, that has transformed the disciplines of medicine and healthcare. The use of best available evidence to inform decisions and best practice has since spread across other disciplines, including in the environmental sciences through evidence-based conservation and environmental management. However, ironically there only appears to be a single scoping review on the impacts and return-on-investment of EBP in healthcare and it is unclear whether any such evidence exists in the broad field of conservation and environmental management. In this scoping review, we aim to explore the extent to which evaluations of the impacts and return-on-investment of EBP and evidence use have been conducted in conservation and environmental management on both human and environmental outcomes. We will search at least ten different electronic bibliographic platforms, databases, and search engines for published and grey literature, from 1992 to 2025 – there will be no geographical or language restrictions on the documents included. A machine learning-assisted review process will be followed using open source tools (ASReview and SysRev) and following the comprehensive SYstematic review Methodology Blending Active Learning and Snowballing (SYMBALS). The findings from the scoping review will be useful to inform organisations and practitioners considering implementing EBP on its benefits and costs and will also highlight potential research gaps on the impact of EBP and evidence use.

Figures