Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DSM 34271 as an acidity regulator additive for all animal species (Lactosan GmbH & Co.KG)
Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba, Marta López‐Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Carlo Nebbia, Alena Pechová, Miguel Prieto‐Maradona, Ilen Röhe

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the safety and effectiveness of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DSM 34271 as a feed additive for regulating acidity in animal feed.
Contribution
The study confirms the safety and efficacy of L. plantarum DSM 34271 as an acidity regulator in feed for all animal species.
Findings
L. plantarum DSM 34271 is safe for target species, consumers, and the environment.
The additive can reduce the pH of plant-origin feed materials when used at a minimum concentration of 1.0 × 10⁸ CFU/kg.
The additive is a skin and respiratory sensitiser, posing risks via dermal and respiratory exposure.
Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DSM 34271 when used as a technological additive (acidity regulator) in feed for all animal species. The additive is intended to be incorporated into feed materials of plant origin with high moisture content (dry matter range between 25 and 40%). The bacterial species L. plantarum is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment. The identity of the strain has been clearly established and it did not show acquired resistance to antibiotics of human and veterinary importance. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the preparation of L. plantarum DSM 34271 is safe for the target species, consumers and the environment. Regarding user safety, the additive should be considered as a skin and respiratory…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAgricultural safety and regulations · Occupational exposure and asthma · Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
